16976 stories
·
169 followers

The scone pronunciation map of Britain

2 Shares
Is it scone as in ‘bone’, or scone as in ‘gone’?

Read the whole story
fxer
1 day ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

Sunken superyacht believed to contain watertight safes | CNN

2 Comments and 3 Shares

Specialist divers surveying the wreckage of the $40 million superyacht that sank off Sicily in August, killing eight people including British tech tycoon Mike Lynch, have asked for heightened security to guard the vessel, over concerns that sensitive data locked in its safes may interest foreign governments, multiple sources told CNN.

Italian Prosecutors who have opened up a criminal probe into multiple manslaughter and negligent shipwreck think the 56-meter (184-foot) yacht, the Bayesian, may contain highly sensitive data tied to a number of Western intelligence services, four sources familiar with the investigation and salvage operation said.

Lynch was associated with British, American and other intelligence services through his various companies, including the cyber security company he founded, Darktrace.

That company was sold to Chicago-based private equity firm Thoma Bravo in April. Lynch, whose wife’s company Revtom Limited owned the vessel, was also an adviser to British prime ministers David Cameron and Theresa May on science, technology and cyber security during their tenures, according to British government and public Darktrace records.

The sunken vessel, lying on the seabed at a depth of some 50 meters (164 feet), is thought to have watertight safes containing two super-encrypted hard drives that hold highly classified information, including passcodes and other sensitive data, an official involved in the salvage plans, who asked not to be named, told CNN. Specialist divers with remote cameras have searched the boat extensively.

Initially, local law enforcement feared that would-be thieves might try to reach the wreckage to find expensive jewelry and other objects of value still onboard the yacht, according to divers with the Fire Brigade who spoke with CNN. Now they are concerned that the wreckage, expected to be raised in the coming weeks as part of the criminal investigation into the tragedy, will also be of interest to foreign governments, including Russia and China. They have requested that the yacht be guarded closely, both above water and with underwater surveillance.

“A formal request has been accepted and implemented for additional security of the wreckage until it can be raised,” Francesco Venuto of the Sicilian Civil Protection Agency confirmed to CNN.

Lynch, his 18-year-old daughter Hannah, American attorney Chris Morvillo and his wife Neda, British banker Jonathan Bloomer and his wife Judy, and the yacht’s onboard chef Recaldo Thomas died when the ship sank in a violent storm in the early hours of the morning.

Preliminary results from autopsies suggest that the Bloomer and Morvillo couples died of suffocation or “dry drowning” when the oxygen in an air bubble in a sleeping cabin ran out. Autopsy results for Lynch and his daughter were less clear.

The chef, whose body was found outside the vessel, died by drowning, the coroner said. Toxicology reports on the dead have not yet been released, but none had suffered any physical injuries when the boat went down.

Lynch’s wife Angela Bacares and 14 others survived, including the captain James Cutfield, who, along with a deckhand and the yacht’s engine room manager, is under investigation for multiple manslaughter and causing a negligent shipwreck. They have all been allowed to leave Italy.

Some of the 15 survivors, of whom nine were crew members and six were passengers, including a 1-year-old girl, reportedly told prosecutors that Lynch “did not trust cloud services” and always kept data drives in a secure compartment of the yacht wherever he sailed, a source with the prosecutor’s office told CNN. None of the crew or passengers who survived the incident were tested for drugs or alcohol because they were in a “state of shock,” authorities said during a news conference following the recovery of the bodies.

Morvillo represented Lynch when he was acquitted in a criminal fraud case in the US in June tied to the takeover by Hewlett Packard of his software company Autonomy, and survivors told investigators that the cruise was a celebration of that acquittal, according to the assistant prosecutor, Raffaele Cammarano. Though Lynch was acquitted of any criminal wrongdoing in the US, Hewlett Packard has indicated it will not drop its bid to collect a $4 billion civil payout from Lynch’s estate, awarded by a British court in 2022.

In what appears to be a tragic coincidence, Lynch’s business partner Stephen Chamberlain — who was his co-defendant in the US fraud case and the former chief operating officer of Darktrace — died on August 19, the same day the Bayesian sank, after being hit by a car while out jogging two days earlier. A spokesperson for the prosecutor’s office told CNN that Cutfield told them Lynch had learned of Chamberlain’s serious condition and had planned to cut the cruise short to return to the UK to see his business partner, who had been on life support.

The Bayesian sank a few hours before Chamberlain died in the hospital, his lawyer said. Lynch would not have known of his partner’s death, and Chamberlain was in a coma so would not have known about the shipwreck, Chamberlain’s legal counsel said.

Local prosecutor Ambrogio Cartosio said no personal effects, including computers, jewelry or Lynch’s hard drives had been recovered from the vessel. However, the onboard hard drives and surveillance cameras tied to the yacht’s navigation system have been brought to investigators to determine if there is any usable data that might indicate how the yacht sank within 16 minutes of the storm hitting. The vessel did not have a traditional black box or voyage data recorder to record navigation data or audio on the bridge.

After divers complete surveys of the wreck this week, they will make suggestions for how to best raise the 473-ton vessel without spilling any of the 18,000 liters of oil and fuel still onboard, and how to make sure any sensitive data does not fall into the wrong hands. The costs of raising the ship will fall to its owner, Lynch’s widow, as is mandated by Italian maritime law.

Read the whole story
DMack
5 days ago
reply
Superyacht owners, they're nothing like us!
Victoria, BC
fxer
8 days ago
reply
> In what appears to be a tragic coincidence, Lynch’s business partner Stephen Chamberlain — who was his co-defendant in the US fraud case and the former chief operating officer of Darktrace — died on August 19, the same day the Bayesian sank, after being hit by a car while out jogging two days earlier

!!!
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

Read this: The working conditions on Inside Out 2 were reportedly a "shitshow"

2 Shares

We want to believe that Pixar, the industry standard for ambitious creativity and childlike wonder, has a positive workplace culture. Instead, a new report from IGN indicates it's the industry standard for animation (derogatory). In other words, serious grind, for little money, until everyone starts losing their minds. And like every major studio, Pixar execs have been "acting in a fear-based way" since the pandemic and strikes, as one source put it, "So I think morale is really low because people no longer trust that they're being led with their best interests at heart."

Pixar was in a bit of a slump before Inside Out 2 became the highest-grossing animated film of all time. The Pixar employees interviewed described the atmosphere of Inside Out 2's production as "a life or death situation" and "an all-hands-on-deck studio emergency.” Though a Pixar representative told IGN that the workload was normal, these insiders describe the crunch as "unprecedented." Here are just a few of the things the sources said about working on Inside Out 2 and its follow-up, Elio:

"I think for a month or two, the animators were working seven days a week. Ridiculous amounts of production workers, just people being tossed into jobs they'd never really done before… It was horrendous."

"The internal culture of Pixar right now is really rough. There is just an incredible amount of people who are like, ‘I can't do this anymore.'"

"It was rushed work, paranoid work, paranoid leadership, mixed messaging ...You're just working 24/7. And so after a while, your body just starts breaking down."

"It was a shitshow."

Notably, these employees observed that Pixar leadership really believes Lightyear failed because of the same-sex kiss in the movie, which led to a lot of hand-wringing about making Riley seem "less gay" in Inside Out 2, reportedly even "requiring edits to the lighting and tone of certain scenes to remove any trace of 'romantic chemistry,'" according to the outlet. One source describes it as "just doing a lot of extra work to make sure that no one would potentially see them as not straight."

Then, after all that, many of the employees who worked seven days a week for multiple months on Inside Out 2 were laid off. Ex-employees describe the heartache of being shut out of Pixar before even getting to see the project across the finish line; worse, they lost not only their modest salaries but also the bonus pay that was promised should Inside Out 2 become a success. (Spoiler alert: It did!) "To be told by our HR reps that we were not going to qualify for that bonus felt like an ultimate 'fuck you' from Disney," one ex-employee said. Another is quoted as saying, "I would venture that at least 95% of the people that got laid off are financially fucked right now." You can read the full, messy report here.



Read the whole story
fxer
14 days ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

Ban warnings fly as users dare to probe the “thoughts” of OpenAI’s latest model

1 Comment and 2 Shares
An illustration of gears shaped like a brain.

Enlarge (credit: Andriy Onufriyenko via Getty Images)

OpenAI truly does not want you to know what its latest AI model is "thinking." Since the company launched its "Strawberry" AI model family last week, touting so-called reasoning abilities with o1-preview and o1-mini, OpenAI has been sending out warning emails and threats of bans to any user who tries to probe how the model works.

Unlike previous AI models from OpenAI, such as GPT-4o, the company trained o1 specifically to work through a step-by-step problem-solving process before generating an answer. When users ask an "o1" model a question in ChatGPT, users have the option of seeing this chain-of-thought process written out in the ChatGPT interface. However, by design, OpenAI hides the raw chain of thought from users, instead presenting a filtered interpretation created by a second AI model.

Nothing is more enticing to enthusiasts than information obscured, so the race has been on among hackers and red-teamers to try to uncover o1's raw chain of thought using jailbreaking or prompt injection techniques that attempt to trick the model into spilling its secrets. There have been early reports of some successes, but nothing has yet been strongly confirmed.

Read 10 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Read the whole story
fxer
14 days ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
tante
16 days ago
reply
OpenAI is threatening to ban everyone who tries to research what their new model is actually doing.

While OpenAI uses a lot of language about "safeguards" it's mostly about keeping the illusion intact that o1 is a big leap when in fact it is a marginal patch to what they have been doing for a long time now. But they are looking for money right now and need to keep the hype active.
Berlin/Germany

How crypto bros wrested Flappy Bird from its creator | Ars Technica

1 Comment and 3 Shares
Fans of ultra-viral mobile gaming hit Flappy Bird who were stunned by the game's sudden removal from the iOS App Store 10 years ago were probably even more stunned by last week's equally sudden announcement that Flappy Bird is coming back with a raft of new characters and game modes. Unfortunately, the new version of Flappy Bird seems to be the result of a yearslong set of legal maneuvers by a crypto-adjacent game developer intent on taking the "Flappy Bird" name from the game's original creator, Dong Nguyen.

"No, I have no related with their game. I did not sell anything," Nguyen wrote on social media over the weekend in his first post since 2017. "I also don't support crypto," Nguyen added.

"Flappy Bird was designed to play in a few minutes when you are relaxed," Nguyen said in a 2014 interview after removing the game from mobile app stores. "But it happened to become an addictive product. I think it has become a problem. To solve that problem, it’s best to take down Flappy Bird. It's gone forever."

“A decade-long, convoluted journey to get here”

So how can another company release a game named Flappy Bird without Nguyen's approval or sale of the rights? Court filings show that a company called Gametech Holdings filed a "notice of opposition" against Nguyen with the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in late 2023, seeking to invalidate his claim on the "Flappy Bird" name. When Nguyen, who lives in Vietnam, didn't respond to that notice by November, the US Patent and Trademark Office entered a default judgment against him and officially canceled his trademark in January, allowing Gametech to legally claim the name.

But Gametech's efforts to legally acquire the Flappy Bird name seem to go back much further than that. Back in 2014, an outfit called Mobile Media Partners tried to claim the Flappy Bird trademark in a filing made mere days after Nguyen pulled the game from the App Store. Coincidentally enough, the specific New Jersey address listed by Mobile Media Partners on that 2014 application matches an address used by Gametech Holdings in the paperwork for its 2023 legal efforts.

Mobile Media Partners' 2014 application makes reference to a (now-defunct) <a href="http://FlappyBirdReturns.com" rel="nofollow">FlappyBirdReturns.com</a> and asserts that the company had "reserved/acquired the name from Apple in their Apps Store [sic]." It also claims that "Flappy Bird" is "not being used by any other companies and/or people," taking quick advantage of Nguyen's decision to take the game down.

With this "evidence," the USPTO actually granted Mobile Media Partners a Flappy Bird trademark in 2018, a fact that Gametech cited in its successful 2023 opposition to Nguyen's use of the mark.

In a press release, a spokesperson for the newly formed Flappy Bird Foundation—which acquired the trademark from Gametech—summed this all up as "a decade-long, convoluted journey to get here." The new company said it also acquired the legal rights to Piou Piou vs. Cactus, a little-known 2011 web game that seems to have heavily inspired Flappy Bird.

The newly launched FlappyBird.org website proudly refers to "the decade-long mission" to revive the game, which "involved acquiring legal rights." The post also mentions "working with my predecessor to uncage me and re-hatch..." in phrasing that seems to imply a link to the original Flappy Bird but which could also reference the Piou Piou vs. Cactus acquisition.


Page 2

The Flappy Bird Foundation said in its announcement that it is "committed to preserving the Flappy Bird IP and expanding the legacy of Flappy Bird." The organization's social media promises the game is "100% FREE TO PLAY and always will be," while linking to a playable version on messaging app Telegram, of all places (native mobile versions are being promised for 2025).

But despite the organization's nonprofit-sounding name and promises, there are multiple signs the new Flappy Bird is planning some tight integration with the very profit-focused cryptocurrency industry.

Michael Roberts, who's listed in the press release as "the chief creative behind Flappy Bird’s return," is listed on LinkedIn as "Head of Studio" for 1208 Productions. Its website describes it as a mobile game developer and production studio that is also "a pioneer in the web 3 space" and "Web 3 OG’s launching back in 2021."

The main crypto-related project listed on the 1208 Productions site is a set of NFTs based around the "Deez Nuts" joke/brand. The webpage for that project also lists Roberts (aka "Papa Nut") as a partner of The Doge Pound NFT project.

On social media, Roberts recently posted an approving link to a Blockchain Reporter piece touting the new Flappy Bird's "strategic collaborations with chief names in the Web3 sector." That piece mentions letting Flappy Bird players join in a "free-of-cost mining event" on the TON network, that will "[blend] the entertainment [of] the classic gameplay of Flappy Bird with the Web3 innovation." The Blockchain Reporter piece also cites Roberts asserting that "embracing TON ecosystem and Web3 target guarantees the further development of the game."

The new <a href="http://FlappyBird.org" rel="nofollow">FlappyBird.org</a> webpage doesn't mention any of those crypto links publicly. But web developer and cybersecurity researcher Varun Biniwale found quite a few such references while digging into the site's hidden, unlinked content. That includes a (now-deleted, but archived) page promising the new Flappy Bird will "fly higher than ever on Solana as it soars into Web 3.0... Artists, developers and creators can build, play and earn from the legendary Flappy Bird IP... Flappy Bird will now be the world’s first open-source, community owned Web 2 and Web 3 game."

Biniwale's discoveries also include a rough WebGL version of the game, which has references to a $FLAP Token that can be stored on a linked crypto wallet through the TON Network.

The Flappy Bird Foundation has not responded to Ars Technica's request for comment, so it's hard to get any clarity on the new Flappy Bird's seeming plans to engage with the crypto world. What seems clear, though, is that the current claimants to the Flappy Bird legacy acquired the name through a rather hostile legal takeover and seem more than intent on milking the brand for all it's worth.

Read the whole story
fxer
14 days ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
hostinger
15 days ago
reply
This sucks. It's apparently OK now to just bully your way into stealing people's content, as long as you're rich enough to afford the lawyers to make it happen. So much of internet culture is being obliterated and mowed down for one-off crypto scams that disappear a few months later.
Japan

Key Dem Senators Call For Probe Into Allegations That Egypt Funneled $10M To Trump For 2016 Campaign

2 Shares

Democratic senators on two relevant committees are calling for their panels to investigate allegations last month in the Washington Post about a now-closed government probe into whether Egypt funneled $10 million to Donald Trump during his 2016 campaign for president. 

It’s been more than a month since the Post report was published, but so far Senate Democrats, who hold oversight and subpoena power for the upper chamber of Congress, have not taken any public steps to open an investigation into the complex set of allegations. Until now. In recent interviews, two Judiciary Committee Democrats and one Intel Committee Democrat told TPM they want their respective committees to look into the allegations.

“There are so many other issues arising, but I think that we shouldn’t let it drop,” Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-HI), a member of the Judiciary Committee, told TPM. “I’m very concerned that this is something that he did.”

“What is that all about? Why is he possibly taking ten million dollars from another country? And what did he provide to them?” she continued. “So we should get to the bottom of it — among so many other things that involve him.”

Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ), another member of the Judiciary Committee, also told TPM that the allegations should be investigated, though he doesn’t know the specifics of what the Judiciary Committee might do.

“At this point, I do not know,” Hirono said when asked if the Judiciary Committee is planning to take any action to use their oversight or subpoena power. 

The Senate Judiciary Committee told TPM it has nothing to share about a potential investigation into the Washington Post report at this time. Judiciary Committee Chair Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) did not respond to requests for comment.

Separately, Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR), a member of the Intelligence Committee, told TPM “it is very important that there be further investigation.” As for next steps, Wyden punted the question to Intelligence Committee Chairman Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA).

The Senate Intelligence Committee and Warner did not return requests for comment. 

Neither did Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY).

The Post broke the story Aug. 2, though questions surrounding the 2016 Trump campaign’s relationship with Egypt have been percolating for years. 

The case and questions about the relationship first came onto journalists’ radar in the form of a mysterious, partly sealed court battle at the height of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation. All that could be seen through redactions was that an unknown state-owned entity was willing to shill out millions of dollars to avoid complying with a subpoena. CNN later revealed bare-bones details of the case: It involved an Egyptian state-owned bank, and had to do with an investigation into a potential illegal foreign campaign contribution that Trump may have received. 

But the Washington Post story both revealed the scale of the potential scandal and raised troubling, unanswered questions. 

Per the story, it all began in the final days of the 2016 campaign. Trump, in some form, provided his campaign with $10 million of his own money. 

The next year, U.S. government officials were alarmed to learn of classified intelligence collected by the CIA indicating that Egyptian President Abdel Fatah El-Sisi had sought to transfer $10 million to Trump in the final weeks of the 2016 campaign. 

Per the Post report, investigators theorized that Trump may have given the campaign the money because he believed that Sisi would repay him the same. They found a few intriguing clues, among them: The two had met a month before, in September 2016, at the UN General Assembly. 

Then in 2019, the Post reported, investigators uncovered new evidence: In January 2017, an organization tied to Egyptian intelligence had withdrawn nearly $10 million in cash from the country’s national bank, draining what the Post described as a “sizable share” of Egypt’s national foreign currency reserves. 

That poured gasoline on investigators’ suspicion that Trump had received an illegal campaign boost from the Egyptian government. But later that year, the paper reported, Trump’s political appointees moved to squash the case.

Then-Attorney General Bill Barr reportedly directed D.C. U.S. Attorney Jesse Liu, a Trump appointee, to look at the underlying intelligence and decide whether to keep the investigation alive. Barr later directed another subordinate, Michael Sherwin, to take the case. Sherwin closed it in June 2020. 

It all raises deep, troubling questions: Did Trump receive the $10 million? What might he have promised in exchange? How and why did his political appointees shut down the case? 

Over the past several years, Egypt has been a bipartisan investor in less-than-scrupulous American politicians. Ex-Senate Foreign Affairs Committee Leader Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) resigned last month after being convicted of bribery, acting as a foreign agent, and other charges over his ties to Egypt. 

Still, not everyone seems to be convinced there’s something to be investigated.

“Is there any truth to that?” Sen. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) told TPM when asked about the possibility of Trump taking money from the Egyptian government, adding he didn’t know anything about the report and that he had only heard “rumors.”

When pressed if the Intelligence Committee is planning to take action based on the Post’s findings, Kelly said, “I wouldn’t say if we were.”

While Senate Democrats, who currently hold the majority in the upper chamber, seem reluctant to move expeditiously, or at all, to look into the allegations, minority Democrats on the House Oversight Committee launched an investigation earlier this month, sending a letter to Trump. In the letter, Democrats asked Trump, among other things, whether any money from the Egyptian government had benefited him or his campaign, to provide records about the $10 million contribution, and to disclose the names of anyone involved in arranging the alleged transfer. 

But the House Democrats’ own investigation will be limited in its ability to retrieve information absent the subpoena power that comes with majority control.

Read the whole story
fxer
14 days ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories