17949 stories
·
174 followers

When it comes to total water use, AI data centers are a drop in the bucket

1 Share

If you hang out in any even vaguely AI-skeptical parts of the Internet, you've probably stumbled on plenty of memes and posts premised on data centers' insatiable thirst for water to power evaporative cooling. But a new report from Amazon highlights just how little water all these AI data centers are using in aggregate, on a relative basis, even as individual data centers can strain local water supplies.

In a Thursday blog post, Amazon claims its data centers withdrew "about 2.5 billion gallons" globally in 2025. That number sounds incredibly large at first glance, but it looks downright puny compared to the 117 trillion gallons of water withdrawn in the US alone in 2015. It's also useful to compare Amazon's number to stats from more water-intensive areas, from the 3.3 trillion gallons used annually on US lawns and landscaping to the 1.3 trillion gallons a year used in California almond orchards to the 531 billion gallons a year used just for US golf courses.

Amazon is just one company, of course, and a relative latecomer to reporting its data center water usage numbers. Google data centers withdrew about more than 6.1 billion gallons of water in 2024, on top of about 2.75 billion gallons from Microsoft and about 1.4 billion gallons from Meta in the same year.

All told, a 2021 Nature study estimates that all US data centers combined consumed about 163 billion gallons of water that year, a number that includes "indirect" consumption from non-renewable power sources. That number has doubtlessly increased in the AI-driven years since that study was published—one analysis estimates that Texas data centers alone used 25 to 49 billion gallons in 2024, and could grow to withdraw 399 billion gallons in 2030. But even annual data center water usage measured in the trillions would represent a figurative (and kind of literal) drop in the bucket compared to national and worldwide water usage statistics.

Think globally, worry locally

While there's no risk of big tech companies literally draining the oceans to power the data centers behind their LLMs, even moderately sized data centers can have an outsized effect on nearby water resources. A single Meta data center in Newton County, Georgia, for instance, now uses about 10 percent of the entire county's water supply, according to a New York Times report from last year. And the Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin recently estimated that data centers account for 8 percent of total water consumption in the region, a rate that could climb to 29 percent by 2050 if the large concentration of data centers in northern Virginia continues apace.

That kind of concentrated water use can put severe strain on local infrastructure and water supplies, and has led to at least one situation where a data center siphoned millions of gallons from local sources without initially paying. The local impacts can be especially severe in areas that are already water-stressed; a 2025 Business Insider report found that 40 percent of planned and existing data centers in the US are in areas with "high" or "extremely high" water scarcity, as measured by the World Resources Institute.

In light of these concerns, the biggest tech companies are eager to project an image of efficiency and responsible stewardship regarding water supplies. Amazon says it has been letting data centers run hotter to use less water for cooling, helping it to use less water per kilowatt-hour than other major data center providers. Amazon also says it's funding "50 water projects expected to return more than 5.8 billion gallons of water annually for use by local communities," and Google has laid out 165 water stewardship projects that it says "are expected to replenish more than 19 billion gallons of water annually by 2030."

If all the memes and worries about data center water consumption are helping to drive this kind of environmental responsibility among PR-focused big tech companies, that's all for the better. But if your concerned friend starts worrying about AI data centers literally causing a worldwide water catastrophe, the actual numbers involved should hopefully put those worries to rest.

Read full article

Comments



Read the whole story
fxer
5 hours ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

Inside the onsen: A Japanese hot spring expert shares some naked truths about naked bathing | CNN

2 Shares

Sitting atop a rocky outcrop on Japan’s Izu Peninsula, the pool at Kuroneiwa-buro is so close to the Pacific that the waves are only just out of reach as they crash onto the boulders nearby.

The hot spring is in the tiny fishing harbor community of Hokkawa Onsen. It’s the kind of town you read about in stories on the country’s rapidly aging population — a place young people leave in search of better jobs elsewhere.

It’s certainly not a place you’d expect to find a Western tourist on a Monday afternoon. So naturally, I was a bit surprised to see a foreign woman walking into the hot spring facility’s bathing area.

Taking a quick look around, she headed straight for the source, where water gushes out of a pipe at temperatures well over 50 degrees Celsius, or over 122 Fahrenheit.

Without hesitating, she started scooping it up with her hands and throwing it onto her body.

“Hot! Hot! HOT!” she squealed while doing a frantic little hop as her skin quickly turned red.

She was engaging in what’s called kakeyu — the pre-bath rinse. Everyone does it. But somewhere near the hot spring entrance, a well-meaning sign in awkwardly written English seemingly confused her: “Please pour hot water on yourself before bathing.”

Technically correct, she followed the sign’s instructions. Just not the intent.

“Not that water — you’ll burn yourself!” I called out from the hot spring pool. “Use the bucket and scoop water from the bath, not the source.”

She paused and blinked.

“Ohhh. THAT’S what the sign means.”

I witness moments like this all the time while traveling around Japan — small misunderstandings that can ruin a foreign visitor’s entire experience.

And Japan’s famed hot springs, or onsen, are full of invisible tripwires, from nudity to tattoos, along with a host of unspoken protocols in between.

That’s part of what drew me to them. Born and raised in Japan but having spent most of my adult life in the US, I found myself rediscovering onsen culture, almost like a visitor, when I returned.

At first, even bathing naked around strangers felt uncomfortable again. Relearning both the customs and the experience itself made me more curious about this part of my Japanese heritage.

As I learned more, I wanted foreign visitors to enjoy onsen the way they’re meant to be — a relaxing experience, not a survival test.

That is why I became a certified onsen sommelier. Yes, it’s a real thing.

I’ve traveled more than 1,900 miles, from Hokkaido to Okinawa, on a quest to discover the most extraordinary onsen. I’ve even worked in a hot spring inn — that’s how passionate I am about them.

While the word “onsen” is sometimes loosely translated as public bath, there are certain boxes one must tick. When we say onsen, we’re referring to the hot spring water that bubbles up or is pumped from deep within the Earth.

As the world’s hot spring capital, Japan has over 25,000 natural thermal water sources. The Japanese take hot springs so seriously that there’s even an Onsen Law. Legally, the water must naturally emerge from the ground at a minimum temperature of 25 C (77 F). Or, if it’s cooler, it needs to contain one of 19 minerals or components — such as sulfur, iron or carbon dioxide — above regulated minimum levels.

Onsen water is also classified by pH, from strongly acidic to strongly alkaline, and most hot spring facilities display a chart highlighting the water’s components and therapeutic properties.

These waters can be enjoyed in single locations in any given town or city, and many onsen inns welcome day visitors for a fee, often under $10. Some destinations even have free public onsen facilities.

Japan is also filled with entire hot spring towns — it’s easy to know you’re in one as the town name usually includes the word “Onsen.” They offer a range of accommodations, from traditional ryokans (inns) to Western-style hotels, all designed around enjoying the healing waters that flow through the area.

Take the town of Fukuji Onsen, about a five-hour train and bus journey from the metropolis of Nagoya. Tucked deep in the mountains, it has just 11 inns, many over 100 years old and set in renovated traditional houses.

At night, the inns glow under a soft, orange light, creating a dreamlike, almost time-traveling atmosphere.

I fell so in love with this town that I decided to get my first onsen job there, and gained an insider’s view of the dos and don’ts that can make or break trips for foreign visitors. I worked at a 170-year-old farmhouse-turned-retreat called Soene, which has just 15 cozy guest rooms and three bubbling onsen areas for guests to bathe in. There’s a staff of around 15 people, and they want nothing more than for visitors to have a supreme experience.

But it can be challenging for them to deal with foreigners, who are unfamiliar with the traditions and customs.

Soene has become a popular spot for international visitors, despite its remoteness. When I worked there seven years ago, the visitor ratio was about seven Japanese to three foreigners. When I went back last year, that ratio seemed to have flipped.

This is in line with what’s happening in the town of Fukuji Onsen itself, which is gaining foreign visitors far faster than it can add English-speaking staff. While the inns are genuinely happy to welcome guests from abroad, they often struggle to comfortably accommodate them.

The main issue? Staying at a traditional onsen inn is a whole other experience compared to a Western hotel. You can easily book a room with Agoda or <a href="http://Booking.com" rel="nofollow">Booking.com</a>, but what those sites don’t often mention are the inn’s unspoken rules and customs.

First off, onsen inns run on a schedule that feels almost military-like. You check in, have dinner, bathe, eat breakfast and check out at set times. And yes — you must be there right on the dot, sharp!

You may be thinking, “Hey, this is my vacation! Why so strict?”

It all goes back to the Japanese concept of omotenashi, or hospitality.

The inn wants to know exactly when you’ll arrive so the staff can be fully prepared to welcome you and your tea and sweets can be served fresh. Dinner is also served at a set time, so your multi-course meal can be presented in perfect conditions, at the perfect moment.

The baths, too, must be kept immaculate and filled with just the right amount of water, flowing at the ideal temperature, when you arrive.

If you arrive late, that entire, perfect plan is thrown off, and what looks like rigid discipline is really the staff scrambling to preserve their idea of flawless hospitality.

I saw this firsthand. One late morning at Soene, a male colleague came barreling toward me, his face bright red, eyes wide, clearly in full panic mode.

“You go to the woman’s bath right now!” he shouted at the top of his lungs, his words tumbling out so fast it was almost like he was spitting them.

Apparently, he went into the women’s bath to clean it, only to discover the foreign guests were still bathing. Yes, he had unexpectedly come face-to-face with women — in the nude.

I immediately ran in to check and confirmed that we had informed the guests to finish by 10 a.m. for cleaning, and politely apologized for the incident, while also ensuring they left promptly.

At a ryokan, timing is everything. With a small staff and a tight schedule, every minute counts. When schedules aren’t strictly followed, accidents like this can — and do — happen.

That takes us to a question many foreigners ask: Why do Japanese people bathe completely nude anyway? Wouldn’t it be more appropriate to wear swimsuits, especially in mixed-gender baths?

In Japan, naked bathing is a centuries-old tradition rooted in health, culture and social norms. Communal nudity was once normal, and mixed-gender baths were common. Plus, inns often didn’t have the resources to provide separate baths.

However, in the 1870s, Western notions of morality led to a nationwide ban on mixed bathing. The tradition quietly survived at some riverside baths, mainly because rural areas were beyond strict enforcement.

But today, most onsens separate men and women. In mixed areas, visitors may use yuami (special garments) or towels for privacy, though there are a few risqué exceptions.

Though rare, the essence of traditional mixed naked bathing — called Konyoku — still endures, especially at onsen with a toji tradition, which means guests spend days, weeks or even months at a destination with the sole purpose of soaking in its mineral-rich waters for health and healing.

Among these is Amagase Onsen, in Oita on southwestern Kyushu island, where a rare riverside bathing tradition dating back to the 1600s still survives.

Open-air baths here sit at the edge of the Kusugawa River, right beside the main road, which is lined with inns, hotels, shops and the town’s iconic bright red bridge. And in the heart of it all sits Jinden-yu, a stone-lined open-air bath with no walls, curtains or partitions. There’s nothing — no trees, grass or rocks — to block the view.

I had heard of this place but seeing it in person was another matter. A dozen people came and went throughout the day, bathing and enjoying the open-air onsen while fully visible to anyone who happened to be walking along the riverwalk, driving by, crossing the bridges, or staying in adjacent hotels.

At the visitor center, staff quietly noted they cannot actively promote the bath, given it sits on that delicate boundary between traditional culture and what might legally be considered indecent exposure.

It helps, though, that Amagase Onsen’s history stretches back over 1,300 years. According to old local tales, “if you dig into the gravel along the riverbank, hot water will spring forth anywhere.”

So people did just that — they dug hollows and stacked stones to form pools. There was little distinction between men and women — bathing was a communal way to share nature’s blessing, with no partitions.

Another famous mixed-gender hot spring is Sukayu Onsen, tucked deep in the Hakkoda Mountains of Aomori, at the northern tip of Honshu, Japan’s main island. It’s known for its massive indoor communal bath and thick, almost otherworldly steam.

A sign outside the bathing area displays the “Three Golden Rules of Mixed Bathing at Sukayu Onsen” — a simple yet powerful guide that reflects the spirit of Japan’s communal bathing tradition:

1. Gentlemen: Eyes off the ladies — No curious staring!

2. Ladies: Eyes off the gentlemen — No curious staring!

3. Everyone: Embrace the bath with an open heart, respect each other, and soak in harmony, no matter your age or gender.

That last one might just be the best advice for any onsen visitor.

Another issue that gets a lot of attention from foreigners is tattoos, as many onsens have signs stating they do not accept guests with ink. This isn’t arbitrary.

Tattoos in Japan have a long, shadowy history. They were once a hallmark of Yakuza (Japanese mafia) membership, their wearers accused of having ties to organized crime. Because of this, many bathing facilities used to turn away guests with tattoos to avoid any trouble.

Today, some reports suggest that only about half of Japan’s Yakuza members are believed to still sport tattoos, as many in the younger generations see them as inconvenient. So simply banning tattoos is no longer a guaranteed way to keep them out.

Meanwhile, tattoos are incredibly common worldwide, making the old rules tricky for modern inns to enforce.

Some onsen have become more tattoo-friendly in line with the changing times, but many continue to ban them simply because it’s easier. There are still Japanese people, especially older generations, who strongly associate tattoos with the Yakuza, and even harmless decorative tattoos on foreigners can feel intimidating for them.

If you have tattoos, there are ways to navigate this.

The website “Tattoo Friendly Onsen” has a large database of onsens that allow tattooed guests. While the numbers are growing, the listings mostly cover larger, well-known onsen towns.

If you stumble upon a small onsen off the tourist path, being upfront could be the best policy. Tell the inn owner about your tattoos before making reservations you can’t cancel. Describe the size and what body parts they’re on. Staff may suggest using waterproof bandages, medical tape for larger designs or suggest booking a private onsen room.

Many inns do have first-come, first-served private baths — perfect for a worry-free soak.

OK, so you’ve survived the tricky terrain of nudity and tattoos. Next up: the unspoken rules.

In Japan, most people won’t tell you if you’re doing something wrong. This isn’t rudeness — it is, oddly, connected to their sense of hospitality.

Rather than confront you, they’ll quietly move away if your towel dips into the bath, or your long hair is hanging down and dancing with the flow of the water. (Both of these are no-nos.)

Once, I came across a guest walking around the bathing area wearing a pair of the inn’s wooden clogs. I had to let her know they were only for the toilet area. Looking a little embarrassed, she quickly turned on her heels and headed back to the restroom. (In Japan, footwear is assigned to a specific location and should never stray from its designated spot — a quietly enforced law of Japanese life.)

Meanwhile, washing and rinsing your body at the shower station before entering the bath is a must.

“But I just showered in my room!” you may be thinking.

Well, your fellow guests don’t know that so it’s just a nice action to assure everyone the bath water will remain clean.

After your shower, return bathing accessories like buckets, stools and shampoo to their proper places. It’s a small gesture, but it keeps the next person comfortable and reflects the Japanese commitment to hospitality.

Another tricky issue is conduct. Sometimes I see foreign tourists arrive with a full-on “Woohoo!” attitude — seemingly on the verge of cannonballing into the bath, sending splashes flying everywhere as they hit the water.

I get it. I share their excitement and completely understand how they feel. As a matter of fact, many onsen-loving locals do share that feeling. But others are visiting the onsen for relaxation and want to experience quiet, meditative-like moments.

That said, some onsen atmospheres can be fun and lively.

Japanese people often say, “read the air,” meaning notice the mood around you. If everyone is soaking in silence, do the same. If the bath is filled with chatter and laughter, feel free to join in. It’s less about rules and more about harmony, respect, and simply enjoying the shared experience.

Ready to take a dip?

I’ve spent decades crisscrossing Japan, soaking everywhere from misty mountain hideaways to grand historic baths, seeking out some of Japan’s most unusual and distinctive onsen and have visited a few hundred of them.

For those looking for something truly unique, here are my three top experiences.

If you think hot springs are for relaxing, Shin Tamagawa Onsen will blow your mind.

Located in Akita prefecture, bathing here feels like rigorous Bushido discipline. The spring, packed with hydrochloric acid, aluminum and iron, has a pH of just 1.2 — about the same as stomach acid. In fact, it’s so acidic that it can corrode a knife overnight.

The facility has retro charm — its numerous wooden baths filled with natural hot spring water. Survival secret: start with diluted water, then move up to 100% pure, and never soak for more than three minutes at a time.

Easy, right? Not when the water stings like fire. On my first attempt, I had to exit the bath after 30 seconds, hissing “ow, ow, ow!”

Meanwhile, an elderly lady, a seasoned pro, calmly soaked in the water nearby, giggling as she watched me jump in and out.

But this water works wonders: it cleanses, improves skin ailments and eases nerve and joint pain.

Picture a hot spring where the surface hardens overnight into a crust, almost like caramel on a crème brûlée.

That’s what awaits visitors to Hanayama Onsen in Wakayama prefecture every morning.

The water is rich in iron, giving it a deep and muddy reddish color. Its high mineral content— especially calcium and sulfates — causes this thin layer to harden overnight as the water evaporates.

Only those who arrive at the onsen first thing in the morning get the chance to break through this delicate layer and enter. With this in mind, I woke up at 5 a.m. and waited for the bath to open. Then, I had to race against another woman who was already waiting.

We agreed to enjoy it together, cracking the crust with our fingertips, then gently breaking it with our palms, before finally stepping in. As we went through the same careful ritual — very Japanese, in a way — we couldn’t stop giggling, the thin crust cracking into little clumps that twirled and melted into the brown water.

This spring, rich in iron, calcium and magnesium, is known for promoting blood circulation, relieving fatigue, improving cold sensitivity and aiding chronic skin conditions.

How about a soak in sparkling water? At Shichirida Onsen, in Oita prefecture, naturally carbonated water flows into the baths.

The concentration of carbon dioxide is so high that, without proper ventilation, you could faint. Thankfully, the facility has large exhaust fans, and all the windows are kept open.

The tiny bubbles pop right next to your ears, tickling your cheeks, creating a playful, fizzing symphony. The moment you step in, bubbles cling to every pore as your entire body is literally wrapped in countless tiny beads of carbonated water.

Even though the water is on the cooler side, I could feel my body gradually warming from within. This carbonated spring is said to promote blood circulation and metabolism, relieve fatigue, and help with cold sensitivity —truly a full-body refresh from the inside out.

The Japanese see hot springs as gifts from the Earth, and it’s an essential experience all foreigners should try.

Just make sure you read the signs, read the air, and please, I beg of you, leave before the cleaner comes screaming for my help.

Read the whole story
fxer
17 hours ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
acdha
2 days ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

Cops Keep Getting Arrested for Using Flock to Stalk People

3 Shares
Cops Keep Getting Arrested for Using Flock to Stalk People

For months during the summer of 2024, Jarmarus Brown, an Orange City, Florida police officer, ran his ex-girlfriend's license plate through the Flock automated license plate reader (ALPR) system lookup database at least 69 times. He searched for the license plate belonging to her mom at least 24 times, and searched for the license plate belonging to her dad at least 15 times. Brown’s searches were happening so often, and were so commonplace, that even one of his colleagues noticed Brown researching his ex-girlfriend's whereabouts while the law enforcement officers sat in their police cruisers, according to court records obtained by 404 Media.

“While they were sitting there, Officer [Shadrich] King noticed Jarmarus was on the Flock system and a license plate reader image of [Brown’s ex-girlfriend] was on the screen,” a police affidavit about Brown’s behavior obtained by 404 Media reads. “Officer King said he mentioned to Jarmarus that he needed to stop running her vehicle in that system because he could get in trouble. Jarmarus responded saying that he knew that, and he was going to stop.” Flock’s automated license plate readers document every car that drives past them, creating a broad network of people’s movements around the country. Police can then look up license plates to learn where a specific car and, by extension, person, has traveled over time. 

Read the whole story
fxer
17 hours ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

World's biggest whale graveyard found in Indian Ocean off Australia - ABC News

1 Comment and 2 Shares
Read the whole story
fxer
17 hours ago
reply
Come see my band Dordrecht Deep Diamantina Zone, new single just dropped Pelagic Ossuary
Bend, Oregon
acdha
1 day ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

Once again, Apple blatantly lies about the EU’s DMA

2 Shares

Apple recently announced its next crack at integrating “AI” into its operating systems, this time opting to simply whitelabel Google’s Gemini “AI” tools instead of developing its own LLM technology. Called “Siri AI”, Apple also stated it’s not coming to the EU, and the company stated that’s because the EU’s basic consumer protection legislation would give other “AI” tools “unprecedented access” to user data on users’ devices. The company made a big stink about this in the press.

As anyone with basic pattern recognition skills already knew, this was a blatant, baldfaced lie. What really happened is that Apple asked the EU for an 18-month long exemption from the EU’s consumer protection and privacy legislation during which it would not have to comply with any legal privacy and interoperability requirements – just so it could roll out Siri “AI” before anyone else could offer a competing product for Apple users.

Obviously, the EU wasn’t going to grant such an exemption.

“The decision not to roll out Siri AI in the EU is Apple’s and Apple’s only,” spokesperson Thomas Regnier told reporters in Brussels, saying there was nothing in the Digital Markets Act to stop the company from introducing new products in the EU.

“Apple was simply unable to develop interoperability solutions that meet essential EU ​privacy and security standards,” Regnier said.

“Instead ​of trying to find ⁠a suitable compliance solution, Apple simply made a request to the European Commission to be exempted from their interoperability obligations under the DMA – and this for at least 18 months. ​That’s not an option,” Regnier said.

↫ Inti Landauro and Foo Yun Chee at Reuters

So what’s really going on here is that Apple wants to offer a set of whitelabeled Google Gemini tools on iOS and macOS in the EU, but because Apple is classified as a gatekeeper, it is legally obligated to offer interoperability options for competing “AI” tools. These options in turn need to adhere to the EU’s strict privacy regulations, so that competing “AI” tools can offer the same level of privacy that Apple’s own whitelabeled Google Gemini tools claim to offer.

Apple didn’t want to offer these privacy-respecting interoperability options as required by law, so instead of following the law in the countries it wants to operate in, Apple asked to be placed above the law for at least 18 months, basically giving Siri “AI” a massive head-start over possible competitors so that it could entrench itself in the userbase. The EU saw right through Apple’s nonsense, and now called them out on their bullshit. Perhaps Apple has gotten so used to openly bribing Trump that they forgot other parts of the world don’t work that way.

Whenever Apple and its PR attack dogs say anything about the EU, you can be assured they are lying. They have proven time and time again to basically never speak a single word of truth when it comes to its dealings in the EU. It’s almost pathological at this point, and what makes it doubly interesting is that Apple will not launch Siri “AI” in China either, for the very same regulatory reasons – yet all China got was a single footnote in a press release.

I wonder why.

Read the whole story
fxer
18 hours ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
satadru
1 day ago
reply
New York, NY
Share this story
Delete

Ted Cruz and Ron Wyden try to fight censorship with bipartisan JAWBONE Act

1 Share

US Senators Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) today introduced the JAWBONE Act, a proposed law that could fuel lawsuits against federal officials who try to coerce broadcasters or tech platforms into restricting speech.

The Justice Against Weaponized Bureaucratic Overreach to Networked Expression Act would prohibit federal agencies and employees from coercing or trying to coerce broadcasters and providers of online services or AI services into changing content. The bill could apply to Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr's repeated attempts to pressure TV networks and broadcasters, or government pressure imposed on social media firms and AI chatbot makers.

The bill would create a private right of action for victims of "jawboning," letting people recover compensatory damages in court. Individuals whose speech is stifled could bring cases against government officials, and the proposed law could be enforced by state attorneys general through civil actions.

"Jawboning occurs when the government pressures private companies to censor speech protected by the First Amendment," said a press release issued by Cruz and Wyden today. The JAWBONE Act is "legislation to hold the government accountable for censorship and violations of the First Amendment," it said.

The bill is bipartisan, and the Republican Cruz previously criticized the Republican Carr for coercing ABC into suspending Jimmy Kimmel. A quote from Cruz in today's press release focuses only on actions taken by the Biden administration, though.

"The Biden administration weaponized the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency to pressure Big Tech into ‘canceling’ Americans who spoke out against vaccine mandates and election fraud. Holding the government accountable and giving Americans the tools to fight back is essential," Cruz said.

Wyden calls out "blatant" Trump threats

The joint press release has a quote from Wyden criticizing Trump for trying to censor late-night TV. "The most blatant example is Trump threatening cable companies because he doesn’t like their late-night shows, but jawboning isn’t partisan, and it isn’t new," Wyden said.

Wyden said that "nearly all of Americans’ speech—including TV news, online streams and social media—flows through private corporations that are highly susceptible to government pressure." A spokesperson for Wyden told Ars that the bill would apply to other scenarios not mentioned in the bipartisan press release, like the Trump administration pressuring app stores to take down apps such as ICEBlock.

A bill summary said that under current legal precedent, plaintiffs must prove that coercion succeeded in causing removal of or changes to content. The bill would let plaintiffs sue and obtain financial damages from "any government agency or employee that jawbones companies involved in social media, AI, or broadcasting, regardless of whether the jawboning succeeds."

The bill specifically authorizes financial damages, because under current law, plaintiffs can only obtain injunctions that prevent future or ongoing violations, the summary said. With financial damages, government officials who engage in unlawful censorship could be held accountable even after leaving office. The bill effectively imposes a limit on financial payouts by allowing compensatory damages but not punitive damages.

Convenient "chokepoints" for censorship

The bill also "requires agencies to submit certain communications with social media companies, AI companies, and broadcasters to a portal with detailed public summaries and full access for Congress, helping ensure jawboning does not occur in secret," the summary said.

The proposed portal would help individuals prove their rights were violated, the summary said. Without this measure, "plaintiffs may struggle to prove jawboning because the government has secretly communicated with the private companies it is coercing. Americans may not even know they were censored by their government," the summary said.

The bill text said broadcasters, online services, and "speech-enabling artificial intelligence systems are critical for access to information and individual expression and have a right to independent editorial judgement. Such entities can also serve as chokepoints convenient for the government to target for censorship of disfavored speech and information."

The bill defines broadcasters to include stations with FCC licenses and the national TV networks that provide programming to affiliate stations. This means coercion of local stations and national networks would violate the law.

"The term ‘coerce’ means to take a harmful, hostile, or unfavorable action, to imply the possibility of taking such action, or to threaten such action," the bill said. The proposed ban has exceptions for lawful investigations, enforcement of federal or state laws, and actions taken under a warrant.

ACLU and Grover Norquist joined in support

The bill has a range of supporters, from the American Civil Liberties Union to Grover Norquist's Americans for Tax Reform. ACLU Senior Policy Counsel Jenna Leventoff said the government has repeatedly "abused its authority to coerce private actors into censoring themselves," and that the bill "would protect the First Amendment by stopping this kind of unconstitutional jawboning against broadcasters, platforms, and AI providers."

Norquist said that "Twitter and Facebook were pressured by the FBI during the Biden administration to delete posts from the opposition," and that the bill "will create a real recourse for victims of this indirect censorship and not let bad actors escape just by changing jobs."

Another supporter, the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), said:

If the JAWBONE Act becomes law, Americans will be able to sue federal officials for violating the First Amendment when they coerce social media companies, AI platforms, or broadcasters to change or take down protected speech. If the federal official did the jawboning “willfully and wantonly,” they’ll have to personally pay the damages. (Otherwise, the government will pay on their behalf.) That means federal employees will be personally incentivized to make sure they’re staying on the right side of the First Amendment when they reach out about speech on social media, AI platforms, TV, or radio.

The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University endorsed the bill as "an important mechanism for accountability when government officials unlawfully coerce private intermediaries to suppress protected speech." Government officials are free to speak directly to the public, but they must not "use threats or regulatory power to coerce private intermediaries into suppressing protected speech," the group said.

Public Knowledge said the bill could rein in Carr's campaign against broadcasters and Trump administration attempts to censor social media.

"From FCC Chairman Carr using the threat of the agency’s regulatory authority to coerce broadcasters over programming he (and the president) dislikes, to officials punishing social media platforms over their content moderation policies, government actors time and again weaponize their power to pressure platforms, AI providers, and broadcasters to suppress speech they themselves disfavor," the group said.

Read full article

Comments



Read the whole story
fxer
19 hours ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories