17807 stories
·
173 followers

Self-healing CMOS Imager to Withstand Jupiter’s Radiation Belt

1 Comment and 2 Shares

Ionizing radiation damage from electrons, protons and gamma rays will over time damage a CMOS circuit, through e.g. degrading the oxide layer and damaging the lattice structure. For a space-based camera that’s inside a probe orbiting a planet like Jupiter it’s thus a bit of a bummer if this will massively shorted useful observation time before the sensor has been fully degraded. A potential workaround here is by using thermal energy to anneal the damaged part of a CMOS imager.

The first step is to detect damaged pixels by performing a read-out while the sensor is not exposed to light. If a pixel still carries significant current it’s marked as damaged and a high current is passed through it to significantly raise its temperature. For the digital logic part of the circuit a similar approach is used, where the detection of logic errors is cause for a high voltage pulse that should also result in annealing of any damage.

During testing the chip was exposed to the same level of radiation to what it would experience during thirty days in orbit around Jupiter, which rendered the sensor basically unusable with a massive increase in leakage current. After four rounds of annealing the image was almost restored to full health, showing that it is a viable approach.

Naturally, this self-healing method is only intended as another line of defense against ionizing radiation, with radiation shielding and radiation-resistant semiconductor technologies serving as the primary defenses.

Read the whole story
satadru
22 hours ago
reply
I've wondered if one could implement self-annealing circuits into structural elements to handle changes due to fatigue.
New York, NY
fxer
14 hours ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

BREAKING: Trump Administration Orders Dismantling of the U.S. Forest Service

1 Share
Utah Governor Spencer Cox (left) and logging executive and USFS Chief Tom Schultz (right) sign a partnership agreement.

Late Tuesday afternoon, with the subtlety of a wrecking ball and the morality of a foreclosure notice, the Trump administration announced the most devastating attack on the U.S. Forest Service in the agency’s 121-year history. Not a budget cut. Not a policy shift. Not a “reorganization.” An execution.

They’re ripping the headquarters out of Washington and shipping it to Salt Lake City, Utah — the beating heart of the anti-public-lands movement in America. They’re shuttering every single one of the ten regional offices that have governed this agency since Gifford Pinchot built the system over a century ago — and with them, the career professionals who spent entire lifetimes earning the expertise and the authority to push back when politicians came calling with bad ideas and worse motives. They’re destroying more than fifty research facilities across thirty-one states, labs that house decades of irreplaceable long-term science, the kind you literally cannot restart once it’s gone. And they’re replacing all of it — the offices, the scientists, the institutional knowledge, the professional independence — with fifteen political appointees called “state directors,” embedded in state capitals alongside the very governors, legislators, and industry lobbyists who have spent their careers demanding that the Forest Service log more, protect less, and get out of the way.

One hundred and ninety-three million acres of your national forests. An area larger than Texas. The largest public land agency in the country. Just handed, on a silver platter, to the people who’ve spent their entire careers trying to destroy it.

And they did it with a press release on a Tuesday.

Upgrade to Paid

Let me be very clear about what’s happening here, because the press release is designed to make your eyes glaze over. It’s written in the dead language of bureaucratic euphemism — “mission delivery,” “state-based organizational model,” “operational service centers” — and that’s the point. They want you bored. They want you to think this is an org chart shuffle. They want you to read the word “streamlining” and move on with your day.

Don’t.

What this actually is, stripped of the Orwellian window dressing, is the largest forced purge of a federal land management agency in American history. It dwarfs anything that’s come before. The BLM headquarters move in Trump’s first term — widely understood, even then, as a deliberate gutting of the agency — involved a few hundred positions. This involves thousands. That one closed zero regional offices. This one closes all ten. That one touched one agency’s headquarters. This one dismantles the headquarters, collapses the regional structure, and wipes out the scientific backbone of the largest forestry organization on Earth.

The BLM move was a knife in the dark. This is a chainsaw in broad daylight. And just like the BLM move, it will work exactly as designed. Because we know what happens when you tell career public servants to uproot their families and move across the country on six months’ notice. We have the data. We watched it happen in real time.

Of 328 BLM positions ordered to relocate, 287 employees left the agency. Only 41 moved at all — scattered across various western offices. And only three — three human beings — actually relocated to the new “headquarters” in Grand Junction. The agency lost 87% of its Washington-based workforce. Decades of institutional knowledge, scientific expertise, and legal acumen walked out the door and never came back.

That wasn’t an accident. That was the plan. And the plan worked so well they’re doing it again at twenty times the scale.

Because the people who leave won’t be random. They’ll be the lifers. The scientists. The ones with thirty years of field experience who know what a logging plan will do to a watershed before anyone runs a model. The ones who know the law cold, who know where the bodies are buried, who have the institutional authority and the backbone to say “no” when a politician calls and demands more timber sales. Those are the people who can’t uproot their lives. Those are the people who will retire, or resign, or take jobs in the private sector.

And those are exactly the people this administration wants gone.

Because once they’re gone, you replace them. With loyalists. With industry allies. With people who have never set foot in a national forest but know exactly whose phone calls to return. You don’t need to fire anyone. You just announce a “move” and let attrition do the killing for you.

Then you fill the vacancies with your own people and pretend the agency still exists.

Of all the places on this Earth to send the agency that manages America’s national forests, they chose Salt Lake City, Utah.

Coincidence?

No.

Utah. The state that is, right now, at this very moment, suing the federal government to seize 18.5 million acres of your public land. A case engineered from the start to reach a sympathetic Supreme Court and detonate 150 years of settled public land law.

Utah. The state whose governor, Spencer Cox, just weeks ago signed a deal with this same Forest Service Chief — the former logging executive — giving Utah de facto control over Forest Service operations on eight million acres of national forest. A “partnership” we called out at the time for exactly what it was: a dry run for transfer. Control without ownership. The first step in a playbook designed to embed the state in federal decision-making so deeply that the line between federal and state management disappears, and when the inevitable push for full transfer comes, the argument writes itself: “We’re already managing it. Why shouldn’t we own it?”

Utah. The state that produced Mike Lee — the rat in the walls of Congress, the most dangerous anti-public-lands politician in modern American history — a man who has spent his entire miserable career trying to sell your national parks, gut the Wilderness Act, auction off BLM land to developers, and dismantle every protection standing between your forests and the industries that want to devour them. And if you think Mike Lee didn’t have his fingerprints all over this decision, I have a bridge over the Colorado River to sell you.

Utah. The state that has been ground zero for the anti-public-lands movement for as long as the movement has existed. A hotbed of Sagebrush Rebellion ideology, where the political class has spent decades trying every conceivable legal, legislative, and administrative maneuver to wrest federal land out of public hands and into the grip of state politicians and their industry patrons.

And now the United States government is handing them the headquarters of the agency that manages 193 million acres of national forest.

In the USDA’s press release, Utah Governor Spencer Cox calls this “a big win for Utah.”

Yes. Obviously.

And of course he’s in the release — when you’re effectively calling the shots, you tend to get top billing at the Forest Service.

It’s the biggest win Utah’s anti-public-lands machine has ever secured — bigger than Bears Ears, bigger than the Forest Service “partnership,” bigger than anything Mike Lee has managed to slither through Congress.

Because this one didn’t need Congress. This one didn’t need the courts. This one just needed a press release and a compliant logging executive with a title that says “Chief” on it.

I need to stop here because this part will make your blood boil.

Forest Service Chief Tom Schultz — a logging executive, installed by this administration to oversee the dismemberment of the agency he now claims to lead — had the gall, the sheer sickening audacity, to say this in the press release:

“I’m honored to help guide this new chapter for the Forest Service, following the vision set forth by President Theodore Roosevelt and Gifford Pinchot more than a century ago.”

Let that sink in.

Theodore Roosevelt created the national forests to protect them from exactly the kind of industrial plunder this administration is enabling. Gifford Pinchot built the Forest Service from scratch, brick by brick, to ensure that America’s forests would be managed by trained professionals in the public interest — not by political appointees serving the timber industry from a satellite office in the state that wants to own those forests.

Roosevelt fought the robber barons. Pinchot fought the timber trusts. They built this agency as a shield for the American public against the exact forces that are now being handed the keys.

And Tom Schultz — a man who made his career cutting trees for profit before being plucked from the industry to run the agency that’s supposed to regulate it — invokes their names while dismantling their life’s work.

It’s vile.

Roosevelt would have run this man out of Washington on a rail. Pinchot would have fought this tooth and nail with every ounce of breath in him. And both of them would be sickened — not just by the decision, but by the grinning cowardice of a political appointee who uses their legacy as a fig leaf while gutting everything they fought to build.

If the headquarters move is the gunshot, the destruction of the research program is the burial.

More than fifty research and development facilities across thirty-one states. Gone. Consolidated into a single location in Fort Collins, Colorado. And “consolidated” is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence, because what it actually means is that decades of place-based, long-term ecological research — the kind that literally cannot exist anywhere else because it depends on specific forests, specific watersheds, specific ecosystems studied over generations — will be snuffed out.

You cannot move a thirty-year watershed study. You cannot relocate a decades-long old-growth monitoring program. You cannot box up a forest and ship it to Colorado. When these facilities close, the experiments die. The datasets end. The partnerships with universities that took generations to build collapse. And the institutional knowledge of the scientists who ran those programs walks out the door, because the administration damn well knows most of them won’t follow a forced relocation to a single consolidated office that has nothing to do with the ecosystems they’ve spent their careers studying.

This is the most respected forestry research program on the planet. It’s the reason we understand wildfire behavior, forest disease, watershed health, carbon storage, old-growth ecology, and climate adaptation. It’s the scientific backbone that every responsible land management decision depends on. It’s the envy of land managers across the world.

And they’re destroying it. Not because it’s expensive — the entire research budget is a rounding error. Not because it’s inefficient — decentralized, place-based research is the only kind of forest science that works. They’re destroying it because science is an obstacle.

Because a scientist who says “you can’t log that watershed without destroying it” is inconvenient. A researcher who publishes data showing that a timber sale will wipe out a salmon run is a problem. A lab that documents the damage from mining runoff or road-building or clear-cutting is an enemy.

And enemies get eliminated.

Once the science is gone, there’s nobody left to flag the damage. Nobody left to say “this will destroy this stream” or “this species can’t survive this level of harvest.” The unprecedented mandatory logging quotas from the reconciliation bill can proceed without anyone left who has the data, the authority, or the institutional standing to object. The timber industry gets its clearcuts. The mining companies get their access roads. And the next time someone asks “what will this do to the forest?” the answer will be silence, because the people who knew are gone and the studies that would have told us were terminated by press release on a Tuesday in March.

We’ve been writing about this for over a year. We’ve been called alarmist. We’ve been told “that’s not going to happen.”

Here’s the playbook, one more time, because it’s no longer a prediction. It’s a live feed:

Step 1: Starve the land agencies of funding, staff, expertise, and authority. Done. This administration gutted more than 25% of land management agency staff. It proposed a budget that slashed the Forest Service by a third. It tried to eliminate all Forest Service research funding.

Step 2: Break the agency’s ability to function. Done. Mass firings. Deferred resignations. DOGE operatives embedded inside the agency. Psychological warfare campaigns designed to demoralize career employees into quitting.

Step 3: Point to the dysfunction you engineered and declare the institution a failure. Done. The press release itself does this, citing “decades of mismanagement and costly deferred maintenance” — problems created by the very people now using them as justification for demolition.

Step 4: Reorganize the broken agency into something that serves your interests, not the public’s. Happening right now. Today. On your screen. With a press release that uses the words “common sense” five times.

Step 5: Hand the pieces to your allies in state government and industry. Also happening right now. The headquarters goes to Utah. State directors answer to state politicians. The research that would have documented the damage: gone. The career professionals who would have resisted: purged through “relocation.”

And there is Step 6, the one they haven’t announced yet but that every single move in this sequence is building toward:

Step 6: Transfer the land.

Because once you’ve moved the headquarters to the state that wants to own the forests, installed state-aligned political appointees as managers, destroyed the independent science, eliminated the institutional capacity to resist, and created a structure where state governments are functionally running federal forests already — the argument for formal transfer becomes very, very easy.

“We’re already managing it. Why should Washington own it?”

That’s the endgame. And after today, the path to it has never been shorter.

Zoom out. Look at the mosaic. All of it. Everything that’s happened in the last fourteen months:

A logging executive installed as Forest Service Chief. An oil governor running Interior. Steve Pearce, a man who believes Theodore Roosevelt was wrong to create national parks and forests, nominated to run the BLM. NEPA dismantled. The Endangered Species Act under siege. The Roadless Rule rescinded. Alaska’s wildlands opened to industry. Mandatory logging quotas signed into law. The God Squad convened for the first time in thirty years to override endangered species protections for oil drilling. Utah’s governor cutting a deal for control of your national forests. Utah suing for 18.5 million acres of your BLM land. Russ Fulcher circulating letters in Idaho preparing counties for federal land transfer. Mike Lee hiding poison pills in must-pass bills trying to sell your lands.

And now this. The crown jewel. The big one.

The agency that manages 193 million acres of your forests — relocated to the state that wants to own them, stripped of its science, stripped of its regional expertise, stripped of its institutional independence, and reorganized into a structure purpose-built for political compliance.

Anyone who still thinks these are unrelated events, disconnected policy decisions made by different people at different times for different reasons, is in willful denial. This is a coordinated demolition of federal land stewardship in America. Every piece connects. Every move advances the same goal: transferring control of your public lands from professional public servants accountable to you to political operatives accountable to the extraction industry.

The Forest Service was the last major federal land agency that still had the institutional muscle to resist. It had the scientists. It had the regional foresters. It had the culture, imperfect as it was, that still believed forests belonged to the public.

After today, that agency no longer exists.

There will still be people wearing the shield. There will still be an org chart and a budget line. But the Forest Service that Gifford Pinchot built — the institution that pioneered the radical idea that America’s forests are not timber inventory to be liquidated but a public trust to be stewarded — was killed today.

And they did it without a single vote in Congress.

Call your senators. Call your representative. Not next week or later. Now.

Tell them this is not a reorganization — it’s the destruction of a federal agency by executive fiat and that Congress must intervene. Tell them to block all funding for this relocation and restructuring until the full implications have been studied, debated, and voted on by the people’s elected representatives.

Tell them you know what happened to the BLM. Tell them 87% staff loss is not efficiency. Tell them that three people showing up to Grand Junction is not “moving closer to the land.” Tell them that if they allow this to proceed, the Forest Service will suffer the same fate at twenty times the scale, and the blood will be on their hands.

Tell them you know the endgame. Tell them this is the on-ramp to land transfer. Tell them that handing the headquarters to Utah while Utah is actively suing to seize your public land is not a coincidence — it’s a tell.

And tell every conservation organization, every outdoor recreation company, every hunting and fishing group, every single person who has ever set foot on a national forest and felt something — tell them the time for polite statements and “concern” is over. The building is on fire. The arsonists are inside. And if we don’t act now, there will be very little left to save.

Stay loud. Stay angry. Stay relentless.

They want us tired and resigned. Don’t give them that satisfaction.

These forests belong to you. Fight for them like your life depends on it.

Because it does.

Share

Upgrade to Paid

Thanks for reading. Until next time,

-Jim

Leave a comment

Read the whole story
fxer
15 hours ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

Running local models on Macs gets faster with Ollama's MLX support

1 Share

Ollama, a runtime system for operating large language models on a local computer, has introduced support for Apple's open source MLX framework for machine learning. Additionally, Ollama says it has improved caching performance and now supports Nvidia's NVFP4 format for model compression, making for much more efficient memory usage in certain models.

Combined, these developments promise significantly improved performance on Macs with Apple Silicon chips (M1 or later)—and the timing couldn't be better, as local models are starting to gain steam in ways they haven't before outside researcher and hobbyist communities.

The recent runaway success of OpenClaw—which raced its way to over 300,000 stars on GitHub, made headlines with experiments like Moltbook and became an obsession in China in particular—has many people experimenting with running models on their machines.

As developers get frustrated with rate limits and the high cost of top-tier subscriptions to tools like Claude Code or ChatGPT Codex, experimentation with local coding models has heated up. (Ollama also expanded Visual Studio Code integration recently.)

The new support is available in preview (in Ollama 0.19) and currently supports only one model—the 35 billion-parameter variant of Alibaba's Qwen3.5. Hardware requirements are intense by normal users' standards. Users need an Apple Silicon-equipped Mac, sure, but they also need at least 32GB of RAM, according to Ollama's announcement.

Further, Ollama now takes advantage of the new Neural Accelerators in Apple's M5-series GPUs, so those brand-new Macs should see extra advantages in both tokens-per-second and time-to-token.

Local models still lag behind frontier models in benchmarks, but we're getting to the point that they're good enough for some tasks users might normally pay a subscription for—and of course, there are privacy advantages to running models locally compared to cloud-based services, though we definitely do not recommend OpenClaw-like setups that give models deep access to your system. The main barriers remain setup (Ollama is first and foremost a command-line tool, though other interfaces have been made available) and hardware capabilities, especially video memory.

Apple's MLX offers optimized access to the memory on Apple's chips, which is shared between the GPU and CPU—a different approach from the desktop machines with dedicated GPUs that Ollama has targeted before. This by no means closes the gap between cloud models and local ones for most users, but it's potentially a step in the right direction for modern Mac users.

Ollama hasn't shared a timeline for when MLX support will exit preview and branch out to more models.

Read full article

Comments



Read the whole story
fxer
1 day ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

Erik Visits an American Grave, Part 2,110

1 Comment and 2 Shares

This is the grave of Robert Barnwell Rhett.

Born in 1800 in Beaufort, South Carolina, Robert Barnwell Smith grew up in the plantation elite of South Carolina and boy howdy would he represent their scumbag interests all the way. He was related to a lot of the Revolutionary era South Carolina leaders. Their interests weren’t really that different than the rest of the nation at that time, but after 1800, with the rise of the cotton gin and the great wealth generated in South Carolina, that sure changed. Smith was headed into politics from a young age. He first won election to the South Carolina legislature in 1826 and stayed there until 1832. This was the moment when the state started becoming a hive of massive extremism in ways that even the rest of the South could not imagine at that time. Sure, the rest of the South might have opposed high tariffs, but talking about secession? That seems insane. That’s because it was insane.

Smith would push these ideas from the time he was young. He loved slavery. Absolutely loved it. He thought slavery was the destiny of the races, with whites naturally leading, and he thought that northern whites were stupid for not seeing this. He and people like him were the masters of the world and he intended to keep it that way. He was elected in 1832 as the state’s attorney general, running on a platform of extreme pro-slavery and nullification and that made him popular. He remained in the position until 1837.

Also, Smith changed his name to Rhett in 1838. William Rhett was an ancestor of his who was an early leader of South Carolina and who had gotten famous fighting pirates and I think was a big time slaver. Smith thought this name change was romantic and would give him additional cred, evidently, and so Robert Barnwell Rhett it became when the man was 38 years old. Seems weird to me. He was pretty fucking weird though.

Anyway, Rhett thought most of the South Carolina elite were not committed enough to slavery and secession. So in 1844. he was part of the Bluffton Movement, which was a group of extremists in South Carolina. The nation had not listened to the South bitching about tariffs and in 1842, passed another one that was not favorable to South Carolina’s interests. Rhett left this movement to stand up for another round of nullification and to threaten again to leave the union. Now, this was too early for secession and so Rhett’s real goal here was to reform the union, even if secession might be the only option. But still, this was pure extremism. It was too much for John C. Calhoun, who was still the real power in the state’s politics. He put a stop to it. But the groundwork was being laid for future actions. Rhett’s favorite newspaper, the Charleston Mercury, wrote of two great evils–the tariff and abolitionism, and stated they were “cohesive, cooperative, concurrent, kindred and co-essential atrocities.” OK then.

Rhett was pleased with the presidency of James Polk, who stole half of Mexico to expand slavery. But he thought the Compromise of 1850 was a sellout to the abolitionist north. Like everything else, only southern extremism was the answer. He convened the Nashville Convention in 1850 to unite the South in secession. The South was not quite ready for this, but he saw the progress. Meanwhile, Calhoun died. Who did South Carolina select to replace him? Yep, Rhett. Calhoun was too conciliatory anyway. But then Rhett thought the rest of the South Carolina leadership a bunch of cowards. In 1852, the legislature decided it would not push for secession right away. In response, Rhett resigned from the Senate rather than represent such a bunch of cucks.

So Rhett went home to his Charleston Mercury and spewed propaganda and pushed extremist ideas and candidates fo the next eight years. By the time the nation elected Abraham Lincoln in 1860, he was ready to rock and roll and his influence had just grown and grown. He was elected to the Confederate legislature in 1861 and remained there for the war. Like far right extremists in our government today, they all hated each other back then too and Rhett loathed Jefferson Davis.

A lot of this is that Davis, like much of the rest of the Confederate leadership, did not believe in slavery as much as Rhett. Just committing treason in defense of slavery was not enough for this man. Oh no, anyone believed in that. No, see, what was necessary was reopening the transatlantic slave trade. That became Rhett’s top priority. He ranted and raved about this at the Confederate founding convention and was infuriated that the Confederate Constitution did not solve this affront to the white race. He also believed that Confederate states should also be able to secede from the Confederacy. Give him credit, I guess. He actually believed this shit, unlike a lot of the Confederate leaders, who only talked about secession as a tool but in fact were totally authoritarian in fact. Rhett believed it.

But I want to be clear–no one and I mean no one did more to father secession than Robert Barnwell Rhett, very much including Calhoun or Davis.

Another reason Rhett hated Davis is that the Confederate president tried to create a functional nation (and let’s not really give Davis credit here, he was terrible as Confederate president even if you take out the reasons why this fake nation existed). So when Davis issued an order that the government confiscate saltpeter supplies, Rhett lost his shit. TYRANNY, he cried. HOW DARE BIG GOVERNMENT LIBERALS LIKE JEFFERSON DAVIS TRAMMEL UPON ON OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

The other thing that happened to Rhett during the war is that he lost all his money, which was of course largely invested in humans. I think a lot of his plantation land was near the Atlantic coast and very quickly, the Union army took this land over and freed the slaves, de facto if not de jure.

After the war, Rhett left South Carolina for Louisiana. At least Rhett had the late life he deserved. He had serious skin cancer problems, which led to noted disfigurement that seems to have disgusted most of the people who saw him. I can’t imagine a more appropriate fate. It eventually killed him, in 1876. He was 75 years old.

In conclusion, Robert Barnwell Rhett is the worst politician ever from the worst state in American history. Burn in hell.

Robert Barnwell Rhett is buried in Magnolia Cemetery, Charleston, South Carolina.

Also, can you help me out here–how did that Confederate flag up on Rhett’s grave end up broken and under my muddy shoes? It’s a real mystery.

If you would like this series to visit other secessionist scum, you can donate to cover the required expenses here. If I haven’t earned support for this series today, I don’t know what I can do. William Yancey is in Montgomery, Alabama and Louis Wigfall is in Galveston, Texas. Previous posts in this series are archived here and here.

The post Erik Visits an American Grave, Part 2,110 appeared first on Lawyers, Guns & Money.

Read the whole story
fxer
1 day ago
reply
This is a good one
Bend, Oregon
hannahdraper
2 days ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

There is no ethical consumption of HBO’s Harry Potter series

1 Comment and 4 Shares
A small boy in a red clock that has the number seven and the name “Potter” emblazoned on it in yellow. The boy has his back turned to the camera as he walks towards a group of people in winter clothing.

In the coming years, HBO wants its new Harry Potter series to become "the streaming event of the decade" as it adapts each of the franchise's seven original books. The show could very well become a hit that captures the imaginations of a new generation of fans who weren't there for the first wave of Pottermania that intensified with the releases of each book and Warner Bros.' subsequent film adaptations. And if this Harry Potter is a success, it could give author J.K. Rowling a reason to consider writing more stories set in the magical world that turned her into a billionaire.

But all of that hinges on whether people will actually watch HBO …

Read the full story at The Verge.

Read the whole story
fxer
2 days ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
DMack
13 hours ago
if only there were hundreds of other shows you could watch, but alas
fxer
12 hours ago
All the teens who crept on an underage Hermione will now be 30/40-somethings creeping on an underage Hermione
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
digitalmediatlm
3 days ago
reply
Designer Stiletto Sandals For Weddings And Parties
For shopping, please visit www.theluxemaison.com

宮ノ下駅 // Miyanoshita Station

2 Comments and 3 Shares

宮ノ下駅 // Miyanoshita Station

Read the whole story
fxer
2 days ago
reply
In Hakone, Japan. Just went thru this station a couple weeks ago, a few days after the author...
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
digitalmediatlm
3 days ago
reply
Digital Marketing Services For Premium Lifestyle Brands. For more details, please visit www.tlmconsultancy.com
Next Page of Stories