17450 stories
·
173 followers

Speaking of Collaborationalists

1 Share

Go fash, go broke:

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft struck a deal with President Trump last month intended to secure the future of New York’s oldest law firm. Instead the pact is backfiring, adding to an exodus of lawyers that has placed the firm on uncertain footing.

Cadwalader already was facing troubles, including imminent attorney departures, before its April 11 deal with the White House in which it avoided a punitive executive order by pledging at least $100 million of pro bono work to support the president’s priorities. The agreement now is pushing more lawyers to leave, people familiar with the matter said, spurred by anger that the firm capitulated to Trump instead of fighting back against an administration campaign that many in the industry believe to be unconstitutional.

A key partner in the firm’s litigation group is in late-stage talks to join a boutique firm and several other litigators are planning an exit, the people said. J.B. Howard, who is counsel at the firm and a former Maryland deputy attorney general, is also leaving and sent a letter to firm leadership protesting its capitulation, people familiar with his departure said.

It’s really important that the law firms who preemptively capitulated to Trump’s illegal demands be shunned by everyone who supports multiparty democracy.

The post Speaking of Collaborationalists appeared first on Lawyers, Guns & Money.

Read the whole story
fxer
1 hour ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

Data reveals Musk has delivered 0.25% of promised federal spending cuts

1 Comment and 2 Shares

"Well, I think we can do at least $2 trillion."

That was the cut to federal spending promised by Elon Musk at a Trump campaign rally in late October. As he defined the objectives of the Department of Government Efficiency for the first time that day, Musk was shooting from the hip. The centibillionaire was supposed to commit to a $1 trillion cut, according to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who helped plan the speech. But Musk doubled the number in a moment of fervor.

A few months later, with Donald Trump having secured the White House and DOGE well on its way to existence, Musk took a step back. "If we try for $2 trillion, we've got a good shot at getting [$1 trillion]," he said in early January. Musk remained committed to $1 trillion in cuts until last month, when he adopted a much more conservative tone, treating DOGE's $150 billion in claimed savings as mission accomplished.

With Musk now preparing to scale back his work for the White House, he joined a farewell Cabinet meeting last Wednesday, during which he took credit for saving the federal government $160 billion. However, the real number appears to be much lower, particularly when considering how much DOGE could save taxpayers in future federal budgets. For fiscal year 2026, Musk Watch's DOGE Tracker could verify just $5.02 billion in savings produced by DOGE.

Of the $165 billion in savings DOGE now claims — another $5 billion was added to DOGE's website following Musk's comments last week — it has only itemized $69.3 billion. But in many line items, DOGE claims savings but provides no information about the contract or grant. This makes these claimed savings impossible to verify.

In other cases, DOGE includes theoretical savings, counting unexercised government options to inflate the value of the contract. To correct for this, Musk Watch calculated savings by subtracting the amount already obligated from the total current value of the contract.

Tallying DOGE's savings that way, and excluding unidentified grants and contracts, we found that DOGE identified about $16 billion in verifiable cuts from grants and contracts. But that figure still doesn't tell the full story.

Musk promised to cut $2 trillion from the annual federal budget. But the $16 billion in verifiable cuts from grants and contracts will be realized over several years, since many of the contracts and grants that were cut spanned many years. DOGE made it difficult to calculate the annual savings because, in many cases, once it canceled the contract or grant, DOGE changed the termination date of the contract to the date of the cancellation.

To estimate the annual savings in 2026, Musk Watch analyzed about 5,000 grants and contracts terminated by DOGE where the cancellation date had not been changed. The lifespan of those commitments averaged 1233 days, or about 3 years and 3 months. So, to determine how much DOGE's cuts could save in Trump's first full fiscal year, Musk Watch calculated one year of prorated savings. We found that DOGE's verifiable cuts to contracts and grants would produce about $4.73 billion in fiscal year 2026. Adding in DOGE's full claimed cancellations of $291 million in real estate leases (even though many of those cuts are dubious) brings the total verified cuts to $5.02 billion.

$5.02 billion is about 0.25% of the $2 trillion Musk touted.

Since entering the White House in January, Musk has overseen an increase in federal spending. The Wharton School's federal budget tracker recorded a 6% rise, or about $156 billion, in federal spending under Trump compared to the same period last year.

DOGE, meanwhile, could end up costing the federal government $135 billion this year when accounting for the lawsuits its cuts have triggered and loss of tax revenue from a depleted IRS, according to the Partnership for Public Service, a good government nonprofit. The PPS model is a conservative estimate; it does not factor in new costs arising from the 260,000 federal workers who have been fired or have accepted buyout and early retirement offers as part of DOGE's workforce reductions.

Republicans have also used the promise of Musk's austerity treatment to justify extending Trump's 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which would largely benefit wealthy taxpayers at the cost of trillions to the federal government.

Although Musk failed to produce the savings he said he would, Trump has described the work of DOGE in glowing terms. "He found $160 billion worth of fraud, waste, and abuse," he said of Musk during a Meet the Press interview that aired on Sunday. "I think he’s done an amazing job." The president, when pressed about Musk's unmet $2 trillion pledge, replied, "Well, we're not finished yet."



Read the whole story
acdha
1 day ago
reply
“We found that DOGE's verifiable cuts to contracts and grants would produce about $4.73 billion in fiscal year 2026. Adding in DOGE's full claimed cancellations of $291 million in real estate leases (even though many of those cuts are dubious) brings the total verified cuts to $5.02 billion.”
Washington, DC
fxer
4 hours ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

Humans still haven’t seen 99.999% of the deep seafloor : NPR

1 Share

Bizarre creatures like vampire squid and blobfish make their home in the dark, cold, depths of the deep sea, but most of this watery realm remains a complete mystery.

That's because humans have seen less than 0.001% of the globe's deep seafloor, according to a new study.

In fact, the area of the deep seafloor that's been directly visualized is roughly equivalent to the state of Rhode Island, researchers report in the journal Science Advances.

Maps created with tools like sonar can show the shape of the seafloor, but it's much harder to send cameras down beyond 200 meters, or more than 656 feet, where sunlight begins to fade rapidly and the waters turn cold and dark. This is the region of the ocean that's considered "deep."

"The fact of the matter is, when you're down there with a remotely operated vehicle or other sort of deep-submergence vehicle, you can only see a very tiny bit of the deep sea floor at any one time," says Katy Croff Bell of the nonprofit Ocean Discovery League, who led this new research.

She personally has been exploring the deep sea for about a quarter century. "But it wasn't until about four or five years ago that I thought to myself, well, how much have we actually seen?" she explains. "And I started trying to find that statistic."

She saw estimates ranging from less than one percent to as much as ten percent.

To try to get a better accounting of the total area of the deep seafloor that's been observed so far, she and her colleagues created a database of all known efforts. They found records of more than 43,000 trips down, starting in 1958, with everything from robotic vehicles to human-driven subs to simple landers that didn't move around.

It turns out that most of the exploratory expeditions occurred within 200 nautical miles of the United States, Japan, and New Zealand. Those three countries, along with France and Germany, led nearly all of the efforts.

As a result, scientists really haven't seen a very representative sample of what's going on around the globe.

"The Indian Ocean is one of the least explored areas," she says.

Bell says we don't know what habitats might yet be discovered — and that even though the deep ocean might be out of sight and out of mind for most people, the currents down there bring oxygen and key nutrients up towards the surface.

"All of these things are connected, and impact us in so many different ways," she says.

What little has been explored beneath the deep ocean suggests that it can have dramatically different ecosystems that support very different kinds of living things. Already, in the ocean, explorers have seen hot hydrothermal vents, alkaline vents, and cold seeps.

"But given how little we've seen and how biased it is, we can't really give you a global map of all the habitats of the deep sea, because we just haven't been to all of them," she says.

Past explorations to the deep have revealed completely unexpected forms of life. For example, in the 1970's, researchers discovered microbes at hydrothermal vents that did not depend at all on the sun and photosynthesis, and instead got their energy from chemical reactions.

"That was completely revolutionary and completely rewrote all the science books," she says.

Geologist and deep sea expert Jeffrey Karson of Syracuse University, who wasn't part of this research team, says this is the first time he's ever seen a well-documented number that really encapsulates what's been seen of the deep ocean floor so far.

He would have assumed the area seen by humanity was less than 1% of the total, he says, but was still surprised the faction would be "such a tiny number."

"We're spending a lot of money to try to understand other planets, maybe planets outside of our solar system. And yet right here on our own planet, we know so little of what's going on in this area that covers about two-thirds of our planet," says Karson. "Almost every time we go there, we learn something new and exciting, and many of our discoveries on the seafloor have been serendipitous. So, you know, we're feeling our way in the dark, literally, there."

Changing how ocean exploration is done will require a focus on developing low-cost technologies that are available to more communities around the world, says Jon Copley, a marine biologist with the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom.

"If I were a billionaire philanthropist and I wanted to make a real dent in exploring the ocean, then rather than building a kind of superyacht research ship, I would fully back the development and growth of these kinds of low-cost platforms," says Copley.

He says this new study shows that a lot of places on the deep seafloor that are known to be interesting have been visited repeatedly over the years, but that's not a bad thing.

"It's always great to go and see what's over the next rise, what's just out of sight of your pool of light from your deep diving vehicle," he says. "But there is, of course, an important need to go back to the same place again and again to see how things change over time."

Read the whole story
fxer
1 day ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

my favorite celebrity non-controversy was when lorde wanted to express her love of baths so she…

1 Comment and 2 Shares

datafags:

testosteronetwunk:

testosteronetwunk:

my favorite celebrity non-controversy was when lorde wanted to express her love of baths so she posted a picture of her bathtub captioned “and iiiiiiiiiii will always love youuuuu” not realizing that whitney houston died in a bathtub

like oh my god. it’s such a non issue but it’s so so funny

this is the type of thing my anxiety thinks is gonna happen every single time I say something

Read the whole story
fxer
1 day ago
reply
I would have gone with “plop plop fizz fizz oh what a relief it is”
Bend, Oregon
hannahdraper
2 days ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

Trump Keeps Doing Sh*t Nobody Voted For, Like Eliminating 'PBS Kids'

1 Comment and 2 Shares
A giant panda lying on its stomach on a wooden platform in a zoo, looking relaxed and sticking its tongue out. A second panda can be see sleeping behind it.
‘Rude Panda! Chengdu, China.’ Photo by ‘Andy,’ Creative Commons License 2.0

Donald Trump’s war on everything halfway good and decent continues apace, with the gratuitous cancellation of an Education Department grant that funds children’s educational programming on PBS. That’ll save $23 million that can now go to about a minute and a half of tax cuts for billionaires, or a month or so of Donald Trump’s golfing trips. (Haha, stupid libs! Complaining about the millions of dollars his golfing costs is so 2017! Everyone’s fine with it now, get some new material!)

Did anyone really vote for this? We don’t remember Trump promising during the campaign that he’d gut children’s programming on public TV; maybe it slipped in there somewhere between the shark-or-electric-boat musings and the weird dancing. Still, it’ll probably win some support from the Usual Gang of Shitheads who think trolling is the entire purpose of government, i.e., the entire Republican Party.

The Corporation for Public Broadcasting said yesterday that it was informed of the cancellation of the “Ready to Learn” grant Friday. The grant has funded PBS Kids programming for preschool and early elementary kids, including “Lyla in the Loop,” “Work It Out Wombats!” and “Molly of Denali.” The main characters in the two non-wombat shows are little girls of color, which may have had something to do with the defunding. For all we know, somebody at Education may have thought “Molly of Denali” was a sneaky attempt to violate Trump’s renaming of that Alaskan mountain to “Mt. McKinley,” although the show debuted in 2019.

Who’s Wonkette’s favorite Muppet? It’s YOU, you adorable fuzzy monster! Please become a paid subscriber if you can!

Madi Biederman, an Ed Department comms bot, explained the final $23 million tranche of Ready to Learn funds had to be eliminated because the program was funding “racial justice educational programming for 5-8 year-old children. This is not aligned with Administration priorities.” Wouldn’t want kids in the Lower 48 knowing that there are Native Alaskans, after all, because all Americans are equal, meaning exactly the same, meaning white. Certainly not African-American / Jamaican like that jerk Lyla.

Biederman went on to explain that the “Trump Department of Education will prioritize funding that supports meaningful learning and improving student outcomes, not divisive ideologies and woke propaganda.” We haven’t watched any of these shows, but previous Ready to Learn grant recipients included shows like “Sesame Street,” “Reading Rainbow,” and “Clifford the Big Red Dog,” which were full of terrible diversity, a wonderful actor who was Kunta Kinte and probably made kids gay with those rainbows, and also a big red dog, which is probably racist to white dogs.

The Ready to Learn grants were established by Congress in 1992, so if PBS sues over this, the network can point out that Trump is violating the Constitution again. Maybe a court will think that matters. Whether that results in the funding being restored is another question; maybe ask all the federal employees who got their jobs back but were then placed on leave forever.

The most recent five-year Ready to Learn grant, which was supposed to run from 2020 through September of this year, was actually approved during Trump’s first term, under then-Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, including continued funding for “Molly of Denali” and for “Lyla in the Loop,” although the latter show only reached the air last year. Guess DeVos just wasn’t racist enough somehow.

This latest shitty move follows up Trump’s executive order attempting to kill PBS and NPR. CPB president and CEO Patricia Harrison noted that Ready to Learn has been funding PBS Kids programming for over 30 years, and that the grants have always received strong bipartisan support during that time, thanks to the shows’ “proven educational value in advancing early learning skills for all children.” Yes, even the children who are Black or Native Alaskan. She promised to “work with Congress and the Administration to preserve funding for this essential program,” for all the good it will do.

More dangerously, Harrison said that “Nearly every parent has raised their kids on public broadcasting’s children’s content,” a statement that no doubt prompted howls of outrage from some fundagelicals who have been boycotting PBS ever since that demon-spawned 2019 episode of “Arthur” with the gay wedding, or who have been mad at “Sesame Street” from the start over all that godless race-mixing. Or mad at “Sesame Street” for including a kid whose family was food insecure. Or mad at “Sesame Street” for Oscar the Grouch watching “Pox News.” Or mad at “Sesame Street” for causing Benghazi, yes really. Or mad at “Sesame Street” for Big Bird getting the COVID vaccine (not even on the show, but in a tweet). Or mad at “Sesame Street” for that 2020 CNN town hall about racism, which doesn’t exist anymore except against white people.

OK, well then we suppose we should rethink our initial position. Obviously some people voted for this. The very worst people.

Share



[Deadline / NYT / Open Culture]

Yr Wonkette is funded entirely by reader donations. If you can, please become a paid subscriber, or if you’d prefer to make a one-time donation, you can use this here button, and imagine that Bert and Ernie are processing your donation. And if you really NEED a tote bag, you gotta pay for those, you.

No such thing as a free tote

Read the whole story
fxer
1 day ago
reply
Molly of Denali slaps
Bend, Oregon
hannahdraper
1 day ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

The Powdered Ingredient Guy Fieri Puts On Almost Everything

2 Comments
You can bet the mayor of Flavortown has a few spicy tricks up his sleeve. Try out the one ingredient Guy Fieri uses to power up just about any dish.



Read the whole story
fxer
1 day ago
reply
Powdered Donkey Sauce
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
fancycwabs
1 day ago
reply
I haven't clicked through to read the secret. Is it "salt?"
Nashville, Tennessee
denismm
1 day ago
“Chicken powder”. So, salt and MSG.
Next Page of Stories