17811 stories
·
173 followers

Introducing Premium Pro: high-frequency fetching for instant notifications

1 Comment and 2 Shares

Some of you don’t just read the news. You monitor it. You’re tracking competitors, watching for security disclosures, following regulatory changes, or covering a beat where being 30 minutes late means you missed the story. NewsBlur has always been a great reader, but for people who need it to be a monitoring tool, I wanted to build something that takes feed fetching and filtering seriously.

Premium Pro is the new top tier. It includes everything in Premium Archive and adds two things that matter when speed is the priority: high-frequency fetching and a 10,000 site limit. And when you pair that with Premium Archive features like classifier-driven notifications, Pro becomes a real-time monitoring system.

Every feed fetched every 5 minutes

This is the headline feature. When you’re on Pro, every single feed in your account is checked every 5 minutes. This isn’t based on how often the feed publishes or how popular it is. It’s every feed, every time, regardless.

For context, most RSS readers check feeds every hour or two. Even NewsBlur’s Premium tier updates feeds up to 5x more often than standard, but Pro goes further. If a CVE drops, a competitor publishes a press release, or a regulatory filing appears, you’ll see it in minutes, not hours.

Notifications that actually keep up

Fast fetching only matters if you find out about new stories quickly. NewsBlur has a full notification system that pairs perfectly with Pro’s 5-minute polling. You can enable notifications per feed and choose whether to be notified about all unread stories or only Focus stories that match your intelligence training.

Notifications go to every platform at once: iOS push notifications, Android push notifications, browser notifications on the web, Mac notifications, and email. Set up a few critical feeds with notifications enabled and you have a real-time alerting pipeline built on RSS.

Classifier-driven notifications, supercharged by Pro

Premium Archive recently added the ability to attach notifications directly to individual classifiers. Train a tag, author, title keyword, or phrase, and turn on notifications for that specific classifier. Track a specific author across a folder of feeds. Watch for a tag like “layoffs” or “acquisition” across your entire account. Get pinged the moment a story about a competitor shows up anywhere in your subscriptions. Classifier notifications work at every scope: per-feed, per-folder, or global across all your feeds.

These classifiers now come in three flavors. Standard classifiers match exact tags, authors, and keywords. Regex classifiers let you write patterns like \bCVE-\d{4}-\d+\b to catch any CVE identifier, or iPhone|iPad|MacBook to track multiple products in a single classifier. And natural language classifiers let you describe what you’re looking for in plain English, like “stories about startup funding rounds over $50M” or “any mention of regulatory action against tech companies.” All three types can have notifications attached.

On their own, classifier notifications are already useful. But on Pro, where every feed is checked every 5 minutes, they become something else entirely. Create a natural language classifier for exactly the kind of story you’re watching for, attach a notification, and within minutes of that story appearing in any of your feeds, you have a push notification on your phone. That’s the difference between knowing about something the same day and knowing about it the same hour. If you’re already using classifier notifications on Premium Archive, Pro is what makes them fast enough for real monitoring.

Follow up to 10,000 sites

Pro raises the feed limit to 10,000. Premium supports 1,024 sites, Premium Archive supports 4,096, and Pro takes it to 10,000. If you need comprehensive coverage across industries, beats, competitors, or research domains, this is the ceiling you’ve been looking for.

Everything in Archive, included

Pro includes the full Premium Archive feature set. That means every story archived and searchable forever, Ask AI for answering questions about stories, full-text content training, global and folder-scoped intelligence training, per-feed auto-mark-read timers, and more. Pro adds speed and precision on top of that foundation.

You also get priority support, so when you need help, you’re at the front of the line.

Pricing

Premium Pro is $29/month. It’s monthly rather than yearly because the high-frequency fetching infrastructure costs more to operate. You’re paying for dedicated polling of up to 10,000 feeds every 5 minutes. If your work depends on being the first to know, Pro pays for itself.

You can upgrade from the Premium page on the web. If you have feedback or ideas for Pro, I’d love to hear them on the NewsBlur forum.

Read the whole story
fxer
10 hours ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
iustinp
1 hour ago
reply
While there might be useful use-cases where this is worth it, it's not for simple users. I'm happy to pay for the Archive tier, and I'm glad Newsblur is trying to make new revenue sources, but from my side, $29/month for just aggregation is too much.
Switzerland

Why Easter never became a big secular holiday like Christmas

Vox
1 Share

Editor’s note, April 6, 2026, 6 am ET: This story was originally published on March 29, 2018, and we’re revisiting it for this Easter.

Christians from a variety of traditions will celebrate Easter this Sunday. Easter commemorates the resurrection of Jesus Christ after his crucifixion. For many Christians, including those from Eastern Orthodox traditions (who generally celebrate Easter later than Western Christians, as they use a different calendar), Easter is the most important Christian holiday of all.

But in North America and Europe, Easter has a diminished cultural force as a time for secular celebration — its wider cultural cachet hardly approaches that of Christmas. As Jesuit priest and writer James Martin wryly wrote for Slate, “Sending out hundreds of Easter cards this year? Attending way too many Easter parties? … Getting tired of those endless Easter-themed specials on television? I didn’t think so.”

So why don’t we celebrate Easter the way we do Christmas? The answer tells us as much about the religious and social history of America as it does about either holiday. It reveals the way America’s holiday “traditions” as we conceive of them now are a much more recent and politically loaded invention than one might expect.

The Puritans weren’t fans of either holiday

Christmas and Easter were roughly equal in cultural importance for much of Christian history. But the Puritans who made up the preponderance of America’s early settlers objected to holidays altogether. Echoing an attitude shared by the English Puritans, who had come to short-lived political power in the 17th century under Oliver Cromwell, they decried Christmas and Easter alike as times of foolishness, drunkenness, and revelry.

Easter has maintained its status as a religious holiday and — the Easter Bunny and eggs aside — largely avoided any wider cultural proliferation.

Cotton Mather, among the most notable New England preachers, lamented how “the feast of Christ’s nativity is spent in reveling, dicing, carding, masking, and in all licentious liberty … by mad mirth, by long eating, by hard drinking, by lewd gaming, by rude reveling!” As historian Stephen Nissenbaum wrote in The Battle for Christmas, “Christmas was a season of ‘misrule’ a time when ordinary behavioral restraints could be violated with impunity.

Like other feasting days (such as the pre-Lent holiday we now call Mardi Gras), Christmas was a dangerous time in which social codes could be violated and social hierarchies upended. (Among the practices Puritans objected to was the popularity of the “Lord of Misrule,” a commoner allowed to preside as “king” over the festivities in noble houses for the day.)

The very nature of having a holiday, furthermore, was seen as problematic. Rather, the Puritans argued, singling out any day for a “holiday” implied that celebrants thought of other days as less holy

Easter, too, was singled out as a dangerous time. A Scottish Presbyterian minister, Alexander Hislop, wrote a whole book about it: the 1853 pamphlet The Two Babylons: The Papal Worship Proved to Be the Worship of Nimrod and His Wife. Using questionable and vague sources, Hislop argued that the name of Easter derived from the pagan worship of the Germanic goddess Eostre, and through her the Babylonian goddess Ishtar. (This claim has persisted into the present day, and is often cited by those who want us to make Easter more fun and secular. Still, the evidence for the existence of Eostre in any mythological system — a single paragraph in the work of an English monk writing centuries later — let alone actual religious links between Eostre and Easter is scant at best.)

Hislop decried Easter as a pagan invention, writing: “That Christians should ever think of introducing the Pagan abstinence of Lent was a sign of evil; it showed how low they had sunk, and it was also a cause of evil; it inevitably led to deeper degradation.” Even seemingly harmless rituals — food, eggs — were signs of demonic evil: “The hot cross buns of Good Friday, and the dyed eggs of Pasch or Easter Sunday, figured in the Chaldean rites just as they do now,” he wrote. Bad history it may have been, but it made good propaganda. 

What did the English Puritans, their American counterparts, and this Scottish Presbyterian have in common? As the title of Hislop’s pamphlet makes clear, they were all influenced by anti-Catholicism: a suspicion of rituals, rites, and liturgy they decried as worryingly pagan. The celebration of religious holidays was associated, for many of these preachers, with two suspicious groups of people: the poor (i.e., anyone whose holiday celebrations might be deemed dangerously licentious or uncontrolled) and “papists.” (Of course, in England and America alike, those two groups of people often overlapped.)

Christmas got reinvented, but Easter didn’t

So what changed? In the 19th century, Christmas, the secularized, domestic “family” holiday as we know it today, was reinvented. In his book, Nissenbaum goes into detail about the cultural creation of Christmas as a bourgeois, “civilized,” “traditional” holiday in the English-speaking world. Christmas, Nissenbaum argues, came to be identified with the preservation (and celebration) of childhood. Childhood itself was, of course, a relatively new concept, one linked to the rise of a growing, prosperous middle class in an increasingly industrialized society, in which child labor was (at least for the bourgeois) no longer a necessity.

Popular writers helped create a new, tamer, model of Christmas: Washington Irving’s 1822 Bracebridge Hall stories, which referenced “ancient” Christmas traditions that were, in fact, Irving’s own invention; Clement Clarke Moore’s 1822 poem “The Night Before Christmas”; and, of course, Charles Dickens’s 1843 A Christmas Carol. Nearly everything we think we know about Christmas, from the modern image of Santa Claus to the Christmas tree, derives from the 19th century, specifically, Protestant sources, who redeemed Christmas by rendering it an appropriate, bourgeois family holiday.

But no such redemption happened for Easter. While it, too, received a minor family-friendly makeover — Easter eggs, traditionally an act of charity for the poor, became a treat for children — it didn’t have the literary PR machine behind it that Christmas did.

Instead, its theological significance intact, Easter has maintained its status as a religious holiday and — the Easter Bunny and eggs aside — largely avoided any wider cultural proliferation. A study by historian Mark Connelly found that at the dawn of the 19th century, English books referred to the two more or less equally. By the 1860s, references to Easter were half that of Christmas, a trend that only continued. By 2000, Christmas was referenced almost four times as often as Easter. Today, Christmas is a federal holiday in the US, as is the nearest weekday after, should Christmas fall on a weekend. But “Easter Monday” gets no such treatment.

Christmas is a more natural fit for a secular holiday than Easter

The reason that Christmas, rather than Easter, became the “cultural Christian” holiday may well be prosaic. Religion News Service’s Tobin Grant suggests that the need for something frivolous to break up the monotony and cold weather rendered the Christmas season, rather than early spring, the ideal time for a period of celebration.

Or it may be theological. Christmas, with its celebration of the birth of a child, is a natural fit for a secularized celebration. Dogmatic Christians and casual semibelievers alike can agree that Jesus Christ, whether divine or not, was probably a person whose birth was worth celebrating. Plus, the subject matter makes it ideal for a child-centered holiday. The centrality of family in Christmas imagery — the Nativity scene, portraits of the madonna and child — allows it to “translate” easily into a holiday centered around children and childhood.

But the message of Easter, that of an adult man who was horribly killed, only to rise from the dead, is much harder to secularize. Celebrating Easter demands celebrating something so miraculous that it cannot be reduced, as Christmas can, to a heartwarming story about motherhood; its supernatural elements are on display front and center. It’s a story about death and resurrection.

But the same qualities that make Easter so difficult to secularize are also what make it so profound. As Matthew Gambino writes at CatholicPhilly.com,“That [paradox] is why I love Easter far more than Christmas. That moveable springtime feast celebrates not the beginning of the God-man’s life but the conquering of his suffering and ours. Easter marks the transcendence of death, the road leading beyond this life into eternity with the Father.”

Christmas as we know it today in the English-speaking world is, for better or worse, tied up in wider cultural ideas about family and a specifically Victorian, Protestant iteration of “middle-class values.” But the mystery of Easter remains strange, profound, and — for some — off-putting. But as the debate over the “meaning of Christmas” rages on, it’s nice to have one holiday, at least, where the meaning is clear.

Read the whole story
fxer
10 hours ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

Endgame

1 Comment and 5 Shares

A 3 panel comic strip: “There’s no way out of this one, Dad. Check.” says a kid who is dominating his Dad in chess. Dad, slyly, angles his watch to reflect a beam of light onto the board, catching the attention of a cat. In the last panel, we see the pieces scatter as the cat pounces. Dad covers his smile from his distraught child.

The post Endgame appeared first on The Perry Bible Fellowship.

Read the whole story
fxer
11 hours ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
dreadhead
3 days ago
reply
Vancouver Island, Canada
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
jlvanderzwan
3 days ago
reply
That's the second comic I've seen in a month that involves the sun reflecting off and old-school wrist watch, which isn't a lot but it's weird that it happened twice.

https://old.reddit.com/r/comics/comments/1rsktxd/it_doesnt_count_as_a_walk_if_you_dont_bring_a/

Tesla sales grew by 6% in Q1, but company has an overproduction problem

1 Share

This morning, Tesla published its production and delivery results for the first three months of 2026. And for the first time in a while, the news has been largely positive. The automaker built a total of 408,386 electric vehicles, a 12.6 percent increase from Q1 2025.

Almost all of those EVs were Models 3 and Y—the company built 394,611 of these, a 14.2 percent increase compared to the same quarter last year. The rest were mostly Cybertrucks, as we learned at the end of January that the aging Models S and X had finally been put out to pasture. At 14 years, the Model S's service to Tesla showed longevity beaten only by Nissan's R35 GT-R, which was old enough to vote when it was finally retired.

Overproduction

Tesla also recorded an increase in sales for Q1, though not to the same degree. It sold a total of 358,023 EVs, a 6.3 percent increase compared to the same quarter in 2025. Unfortunately for Tesla, that growth is only half as much as the increase in production.

Looking at the Models 3 and Y, we see the same trend. Tesla sold 341,893 of these vehicles, a 5.6 percent increase year over year. But it ended up with 50,000 more cars in inventory as well. Sales of everything else—the Cybertruck, Model S, and Model X—fell by 19.7 percent year over year to 13,775 units.

The bad news extends to Tesla's energy storage business. This has been growing steadily in recent years and contributes a small, if meaningful percentage to the company's coffers. But Tesla was able to deploy only 8.8 GWh of energy storage in Q1, a 15 percent decline compared to the same three months last year.

Both car deliveries and energy deployment were below analyst estimates.

Read full article

Comments



Read the whole story
fxer
3 days ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

Self-healing CMOS Imager to Withstand Jupiter’s Radiation Belt

1 Comment and 2 Shares

Ionizing radiation damage from electrons, protons and gamma rays will over time damage a CMOS circuit, through e.g. degrading the oxide layer and damaging the lattice structure. For a space-based camera that’s inside a probe orbiting a planet like Jupiter it’s thus a bit of a bummer if this will massively shorted useful observation time before the sensor has been fully degraded. A potential workaround here is by using thermal energy to anneal the damaged part of a CMOS imager.

The first step is to detect damaged pixels by performing a read-out while the sensor is not exposed to light. If a pixel still carries significant current it’s marked as damaged and a high current is passed through it to significantly raise its temperature. For the digital logic part of the circuit a similar approach is used, where the detection of logic errors is cause for a high voltage pulse that should also result in annealing of any damage.

During testing the chip was exposed to the same level of radiation to what it would experience during thirty days in orbit around Jupiter, which rendered the sensor basically unusable with a massive increase in leakage current. After four rounds of annealing the image was almost restored to full health, showing that it is a viable approach.

Naturally, this self-healing method is only intended as another line of defense against ionizing radiation, with radiation shielding and radiation-resistant semiconductor technologies serving as the primary defenses.

Read the whole story
satadru
4 days ago
reply
I've wondered if one could implement self-annealing circuits into structural elements to handle changes due to fatigue.
New York, NY
fxer
4 days ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

BREAKING: Trump Administration Orders Dismantling of the U.S. Forest Service

1 Share
Utah Governor Spencer Cox (left) and logging executive and USFS Chief Tom Schultz (right) sign a partnership agreement.

Late Tuesday afternoon, with the subtlety of a wrecking ball and the morality of a foreclosure notice, the Trump administration announced the most devastating attack on the U.S. Forest Service in the agency’s 121-year history. Not a budget cut. Not a policy shift. Not a “reorganization.” An execution.

They’re ripping the headquarters out of Washington and shipping it to Salt Lake City, Utah — the beating heart of the anti-public-lands movement in America. They’re shuttering every single one of the ten regional offices that have governed this agency since Gifford Pinchot built the system over a century ago — and with them, the career professionals who spent entire lifetimes earning the expertise and the authority to push back when politicians came calling with bad ideas and worse motives. They’re destroying more than fifty research facilities across thirty-one states, labs that house decades of irreplaceable long-term science, the kind you literally cannot restart once it’s gone. And they’re replacing all of it — the offices, the scientists, the institutional knowledge, the professional independence — with fifteen political appointees called “state directors,” embedded in state capitals alongside the very governors, legislators, and industry lobbyists who have spent their careers demanding that the Forest Service log more, protect less, and get out of the way.

One hundred and ninety-three million acres of your national forests. An area larger than Texas. The largest public land agency in the country. Just handed, on a silver platter, to the people who’ve spent their entire careers trying to destroy it.

And they did it with a press release on a Tuesday.

Upgrade to Paid

Let me be very clear about what’s happening here, because the press release is designed to make your eyes glaze over. It’s written in the dead language of bureaucratic euphemism — “mission delivery,” “state-based organizational model,” “operational service centers” — and that’s the point. They want you bored. They want you to think this is an org chart shuffle. They want you to read the word “streamlining” and move on with your day.

Don’t.

What this actually is, stripped of the Orwellian window dressing, is the largest forced purge of a federal land management agency in American history. It dwarfs anything that’s come before. The BLM headquarters move in Trump’s first term — widely understood, even then, as a deliberate gutting of the agency — involved a few hundred positions. This involves thousands. That one closed zero regional offices. This one closes all ten. That one touched one agency’s headquarters. This one dismantles the headquarters, collapses the regional structure, and wipes out the scientific backbone of the largest forestry organization on Earth.

The BLM move was a knife in the dark. This is a chainsaw in broad daylight. And just like the BLM move, it will work exactly as designed. Because we know what happens when you tell career public servants to uproot their families and move across the country on six months’ notice. We have the data. We watched it happen in real time.

Of 328 BLM positions ordered to relocate, 287 employees left the agency. Only 41 moved at all — scattered across various western offices. And only three — three human beings — actually relocated to the new “headquarters” in Grand Junction. The agency lost 87% of its Washington-based workforce. Decades of institutional knowledge, scientific expertise, and legal acumen walked out the door and never came back.

That wasn’t an accident. That was the plan. And the plan worked so well they’re doing it again at twenty times the scale.

Because the people who leave won’t be random. They’ll be the lifers. The scientists. The ones with thirty years of field experience who know what a logging plan will do to a watershed before anyone runs a model. The ones who know the law cold, who know where the bodies are buried, who have the institutional authority and the backbone to say “no” when a politician calls and demands more timber sales. Those are the people who can’t uproot their lives. Those are the people who will retire, or resign, or take jobs in the private sector.

And those are exactly the people this administration wants gone.

Because once they’re gone, you replace them. With loyalists. With industry allies. With people who have never set foot in a national forest but know exactly whose phone calls to return. You don’t need to fire anyone. You just announce a “move” and let attrition do the killing for you.

Then you fill the vacancies with your own people and pretend the agency still exists.

Of all the places on this Earth to send the agency that manages America’s national forests, they chose Salt Lake City, Utah.

Coincidence?

No.

Utah. The state that is, right now, at this very moment, suing the federal government to seize 18.5 million acres of your public land. A case engineered from the start to reach a sympathetic Supreme Court and detonate 150 years of settled public land law.

Utah. The state whose governor, Spencer Cox, just weeks ago signed a deal with this same Forest Service Chief — the former logging executive — giving Utah de facto control over Forest Service operations on eight million acres of national forest. A “partnership” we called out at the time for exactly what it was: a dry run for transfer. Control without ownership. The first step in a playbook designed to embed the state in federal decision-making so deeply that the line between federal and state management disappears, and when the inevitable push for full transfer comes, the argument writes itself: “We’re already managing it. Why shouldn’t we own it?”

Utah. The state that produced Mike Lee — the rat in the walls of Congress, the most dangerous anti-public-lands politician in modern American history — a man who has spent his entire miserable career trying to sell your national parks, gut the Wilderness Act, auction off BLM land to developers, and dismantle every protection standing between your forests and the industries that want to devour them. And if you think Mike Lee didn’t have his fingerprints all over this decision, I have a bridge over the Colorado River to sell you.

Utah. The state that has been ground zero for the anti-public-lands movement for as long as the movement has existed. A hotbed of Sagebrush Rebellion ideology, where the political class has spent decades trying every conceivable legal, legislative, and administrative maneuver to wrest federal land out of public hands and into the grip of state politicians and their industry patrons.

And now the United States government is handing them the headquarters of the agency that manages 193 million acres of national forest.

In the USDA’s press release, Utah Governor Spencer Cox calls this “a big win for Utah.”

Yes. Obviously.

And of course he’s in the release — when you’re effectively calling the shots, you tend to get top billing at the Forest Service.

It’s the biggest win Utah’s anti-public-lands machine has ever secured — bigger than Bears Ears, bigger than the Forest Service “partnership,” bigger than anything Mike Lee has managed to slither through Congress.

Because this one didn’t need Congress. This one didn’t need the courts. This one just needed a press release and a compliant logging executive with a title that says “Chief” on it.

I need to stop here because this part will make your blood boil.

Forest Service Chief Tom Schultz — a logging executive, installed by this administration to oversee the dismemberment of the agency he now claims to lead — had the gall, the sheer sickening audacity, to say this in the press release:

“I’m honored to help guide this new chapter for the Forest Service, following the vision set forth by President Theodore Roosevelt and Gifford Pinchot more than a century ago.”

Let that sink in.

Theodore Roosevelt created the national forests to protect them from exactly the kind of industrial plunder this administration is enabling. Gifford Pinchot built the Forest Service from scratch, brick by brick, to ensure that America’s forests would be managed by trained professionals in the public interest — not by political appointees serving the timber industry from a satellite office in the state that wants to own those forests.

Roosevelt fought the robber barons. Pinchot fought the timber trusts. They built this agency as a shield for the American public against the exact forces that are now being handed the keys.

And Tom Schultz — a man who made his career cutting trees for profit before being plucked from the industry to run the agency that’s supposed to regulate it — invokes their names while dismantling their life’s work.

It’s vile.

Roosevelt would have run this man out of Washington on a rail. Pinchot would have fought this tooth and nail with every ounce of breath in him. And both of them would be sickened — not just by the decision, but by the grinning cowardice of a political appointee who uses their legacy as a fig leaf while gutting everything they fought to build.

If the headquarters move is the gunshot, the destruction of the research program is the burial.

More than fifty research and development facilities across thirty-one states. Gone. Consolidated into a single location in Fort Collins, Colorado. And “consolidated” is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence, because what it actually means is that decades of place-based, long-term ecological research — the kind that literally cannot exist anywhere else because it depends on specific forests, specific watersheds, specific ecosystems studied over generations — will be snuffed out.

You cannot move a thirty-year watershed study. You cannot relocate a decades-long old-growth monitoring program. You cannot box up a forest and ship it to Colorado. When these facilities close, the experiments die. The datasets end. The partnerships with universities that took generations to build collapse. And the institutional knowledge of the scientists who ran those programs walks out the door, because the administration damn well knows most of them won’t follow a forced relocation to a single consolidated office that has nothing to do with the ecosystems they’ve spent their careers studying.

This is the most respected forestry research program on the planet. It’s the reason we understand wildfire behavior, forest disease, watershed health, carbon storage, old-growth ecology, and climate adaptation. It’s the scientific backbone that every responsible land management decision depends on. It’s the envy of land managers across the world.

And they’re destroying it. Not because it’s expensive — the entire research budget is a rounding error. Not because it’s inefficient — decentralized, place-based research is the only kind of forest science that works. They’re destroying it because science is an obstacle.

Because a scientist who says “you can’t log that watershed without destroying it” is inconvenient. A researcher who publishes data showing that a timber sale will wipe out a salmon run is a problem. A lab that documents the damage from mining runoff or road-building or clear-cutting is an enemy.

And enemies get eliminated.

Once the science is gone, there’s nobody left to flag the damage. Nobody left to say “this will destroy this stream” or “this species can’t survive this level of harvest.” The unprecedented mandatory logging quotas from the reconciliation bill can proceed without anyone left who has the data, the authority, or the institutional standing to object. The timber industry gets its clearcuts. The mining companies get their access roads. And the next time someone asks “what will this do to the forest?” the answer will be silence, because the people who knew are gone and the studies that would have told us were terminated by press release on a Tuesday in March.

We’ve been writing about this for over a year. We’ve been called alarmist. We’ve been told “that’s not going to happen.”

Here’s the playbook, one more time, because it’s no longer a prediction. It’s a live feed:

Step 1: Starve the land agencies of funding, staff, expertise, and authority. Done. This administration gutted more than 25% of land management agency staff. It proposed a budget that slashed the Forest Service by a third. It tried to eliminate all Forest Service research funding.

Step 2: Break the agency’s ability to function. Done. Mass firings. Deferred resignations. DOGE operatives embedded inside the agency. Psychological warfare campaigns designed to demoralize career employees into quitting.

Step 3: Point to the dysfunction you engineered and declare the institution a failure. Done. The press release itself does this, citing “decades of mismanagement and costly deferred maintenance” — problems created by the very people now using them as justification for demolition.

Step 4: Reorganize the broken agency into something that serves your interests, not the public’s. Happening right now. Today. On your screen. With a press release that uses the words “common sense” five times.

Step 5: Hand the pieces to your allies in state government and industry. Also happening right now. The headquarters goes to Utah. State directors answer to state politicians. The research that would have documented the damage: gone. The career professionals who would have resisted: purged through “relocation.”

And there is Step 6, the one they haven’t announced yet but that every single move in this sequence is building toward:

Step 6: Transfer the land.

Because once you’ve moved the headquarters to the state that wants to own the forests, installed state-aligned political appointees as managers, destroyed the independent science, eliminated the institutional capacity to resist, and created a structure where state governments are functionally running federal forests already — the argument for formal transfer becomes very, very easy.

“We’re already managing it. Why should Washington own it?”

That’s the endgame. And after today, the path to it has never been shorter.

Zoom out. Look at the mosaic. All of it. Everything that’s happened in the last fourteen months:

A logging executive installed as Forest Service Chief. An oil governor running Interior. Steve Pearce, a man who believes Theodore Roosevelt was wrong to create national parks and forests, nominated to run the BLM. NEPA dismantled. The Endangered Species Act under siege. The Roadless Rule rescinded. Alaska’s wildlands opened to industry. Mandatory logging quotas signed into law. The God Squad convened for the first time in thirty years to override endangered species protections for oil drilling. Utah’s governor cutting a deal for control of your national forests. Utah suing for 18.5 million acres of your BLM land. Russ Fulcher circulating letters in Idaho preparing counties for federal land transfer. Mike Lee hiding poison pills in must-pass bills trying to sell your lands.

And now this. The crown jewel. The big one.

The agency that manages 193 million acres of your forests — relocated to the state that wants to own them, stripped of its science, stripped of its regional expertise, stripped of its institutional independence, and reorganized into a structure purpose-built for political compliance.

Anyone who still thinks these are unrelated events, disconnected policy decisions made by different people at different times for different reasons, is in willful denial. This is a coordinated demolition of federal land stewardship in America. Every piece connects. Every move advances the same goal: transferring control of your public lands from professional public servants accountable to you to political operatives accountable to the extraction industry.

The Forest Service was the last major federal land agency that still had the institutional muscle to resist. It had the scientists. It had the regional foresters. It had the culture, imperfect as it was, that still believed forests belonged to the public.

After today, that agency no longer exists.

There will still be people wearing the shield. There will still be an org chart and a budget line. But the Forest Service that Gifford Pinchot built — the institution that pioneered the radical idea that America’s forests are not timber inventory to be liquidated but a public trust to be stewarded — was killed today.

And they did it without a single vote in Congress.

Call your senators. Call your representative. Not next week or later. Now.

Tell them this is not a reorganization — it’s the destruction of a federal agency by executive fiat and that Congress must intervene. Tell them to block all funding for this relocation and restructuring until the full implications have been studied, debated, and voted on by the people’s elected representatives.

Tell them you know what happened to the BLM. Tell them 87% staff loss is not efficiency. Tell them that three people showing up to Grand Junction is not “moving closer to the land.” Tell them that if they allow this to proceed, the Forest Service will suffer the same fate at twenty times the scale, and the blood will be on their hands.

Tell them you know the endgame. Tell them this is the on-ramp to land transfer. Tell them that handing the headquarters to Utah while Utah is actively suing to seize your public land is not a coincidence — it’s a tell.

And tell every conservation organization, every outdoor recreation company, every hunting and fishing group, every single person who has ever set foot on a national forest and felt something — tell them the time for polite statements and “concern” is over. The building is on fire. The arsonists are inside. And if we don’t act now, there will be very little left to save.

Stay loud. Stay angry. Stay relentless.

They want us tired and resigned. Don’t give them that satisfaction.

These forests belong to you. Fight for them like your life depends on it.

Because it does.

Share

Upgrade to Paid

Thanks for reading. Until next time,

-Jim

Leave a comment

Read the whole story
fxer
4 days ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories