17917 stories
·
174 followers

Masturbation among birds is ‘natural’ and should not be punished, say experts | Animal behaviour | The Guardian

1 Comment

An investigation into acts of self-pleasure among parrots and other birds has reached a climax, with the results providing welcome relief for vets and researchers, not to mention the birds themselves.

Bird keepers are often advised to discourage and even punish birds for masturbating, but the study found the activity was more common in the wild than in captivity, with researchers concluding it is part of a bird’s natural behaviour.

The report’s authors urged vets to reassure worried owners that the antics are not harmful and warned that efforts to intervene, which range from removing perches to hormone treatment and surgery, could be far more damaging.

“Our big finding is that masturbation is not a negative response to captivity,” said Dr Chloe Heys, an evolutionary ecologist at the University of Lancashire in Preston. “This is widespread in birds and we found it’s a perfectly natural and healthy behaviour that’s part of their repertoire of sexual behaviours.”

Researchers historically tended to assume birds either did not masturbate or did so only under the stress of captivity. But Heys said the behaviour was quite common and distinctive. “I had a pet cockatiel that masturbated all the time,” she said. “If you’ve ever seen a bird masturbate, you absolutely know what that bird is doing.”

The team surveyed bird experts and online communities of bird keepers, breeders and enthusiasts, and combined their accounts with others published in scientific literature. In total, they collected data on 120 bird species, captive and wild.

Avian onanism is widespread among species, including parrots, ducks, turkeys and chickens, and more common in the wild than in captivity, the survey found. Slightly more accounts mention males, but females were by no means exempt.

Typically, males would be “rubbing quite vigorously” on their perch, a toy or a twig, or on their owner’s hand, foot or shoulder, Heys said. Females tended to lift their tail and back on to convenient objects.

The activity was sometimes accompanied by wing flapping and vocalisations not typically heard from the birds. Asked if they showed any signs of self-loathing or Catholic guilt, Heys thought not. “I don’t want to say satisfied, but they do look different after they finish. It’s obviously doing something for them.”

Accounts from hobbyists revealed that some owners had sought veterinary help when they caught their birds masturbating, fearing the animals might hurt themselves. In turn, some vets had suggested disrupting the behaviour, by removing perches and toys and not stroking the birds in certain spots.

“In really extreme cases, vets would give the birds drugs or hormonal therapies to stop them doing this,” Heys said. “There have even been cases of surgery to completely de-sex birds, which is bonkers.”

“Vets shouldn’t be advising owners to stop birds doing this unless it’s obviously caused a chronic problem like a prolapse, but that’s the absolute minority of cases,” Heys added. The study’s findings have been published in the journal Ecology and Evolution.

Dr Ana Basto, a vet at the University of Lancashire who was not involved in the study, said the report would help vets give better advice to bird owners. “This research is pivotal and will be a step towards achieving a more holistic understanding of why and how birds behave the way they do.”

Dr Matilda Brindle, an evolutionary biologist at Oxford University and the study’s co-author, said the work added to a growing body of literature that highlighted how non-reproductive sexual behaviours occurred across the animal kingdom.

“The fact that masturbation seems to be even more common in wild birds than those in captivity has huge implications for their welfare, especially given that folk husbandry often advises bird keepers to discourage or punish this behaviour, sometimes even resorting to surgery and hormonal interventions,” Brindle said.

Read the whole story
fxer
1 hour ago
reply
> Vets shouldn’t be advising owners to stop birds doing this unless it’s obviously caused a chronic problem like a prolapse, but that’s the absolute minority of cases

Shit, is this a possibility in other species?
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

Something’s Rotten in the State of macOS Icon Design

2 Shares

This is an iconic observation:

If you put the Apple icons in reverse it looks like the portfolio of someone getting really really good at icon design

This isn’t, however, just the story of Apple’s Creator Studio icons. It’s the unfolding story of icon design across the entire macOS platform.

For example, take a look at some of Apple’s other apps like iMovie:

Or Remote Desktop:

Apple sets the standard (and the rules) for how icons look on the Mac. Wherever they go, so goes the ecosystem — and they’re taking the entire ecosystem along down with them.

It’s fast becoming the case that if you put any Mac app’s icons in reverse, it looks like the portfolio of someone getting really, really good at icon design.

Even Microsoft — not exactly a bastion of design — starts to look pretty decent with their icons the further back you go. For example, with OneNote, the app icon’s progression looks like it went something like this:

  • “I made this with AI”
  • “I tried to make the AI one, but by hand myself”
  • “I don’t need to be constrained by this squircle”
  • “Hey, I’m getting better at this”

Some 3rd-party apps continue to fight a good fight, even as Apple’s definition of what an icon should be — or what’s even possible — shrinks all around them.

Apps like Capo (remember, these are reverse chronological):

Or BBEdit:

Or Fantastical:

Or Cot Editor:

Everyone’s being put in a box squircle. The imposition is real.

I don’t blame any of the 3rd-party app makers. Their designs have to play by Apple’s rules (or end up in icon jail). World-class designers like Matthew Skiles or The Iconfactory are still out there striving for excellence, even as they’re hamstrung by the Mac’s latest rules.

When it comes to icon design on the Mac, the sky is no longer the limit: Apple’s icon design sensibilities are. They set the examples of what world-class icon design should look like, but what do you do when the examples are no longer exemplary?


Reply via: Email · Mastodon · Bluesky

Read the whole story
fxer
2 days ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
acdha
2 days ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

US healthcare still stupidly expensive, with pathetic outcomes, study finds

1 Share

An updated analysis comparing healthcare systems across 20 countries finds once again that the US system is an outstandingly poor performer, summarized as being a "persistent failure" for its high costs, poor health outcomes, and premature deaths.

"Americans pay more for health care, get less in return, and remain far more exposed to illness, debt, and insecurity than their peers," the report concludes.

The report comes from The Commonwealth Fund, a private foundation focused on healthcare system performance, which periodically conducts such comparative analyses. The new report is based on 2024 data and compares the US to 19 countries, including many in Europe, as well as Australia, Canada, Chile, Israel, Japan, Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Turkey, and the United Kingdom.

As has long been the case, the US spends far more on healthcare than any other of the 19 countries. In 2024, the US spent 18 percent of its gross domestic product on healthcare, nearly twice the average of all the countries, which was 9.3 percent. The second-highest spender after the US was Germany, with 12.3 percent.

Drilling down, the US spends far more on care per person than other countries and spends more on prescription medications. Americans are, by far, the most likely to skip medications, treatments, tests, and consultations due to costs.

US life expectancy at birth ranked third lowest, at 79 years, while the average was 81.2 years. Only Turkey and Mexico had lower life expectancies, which were 77.3 and 75.5, respectively. The highest life expectancies were in Spain (84 years), Japan (84.1 years), and Switzerland (84.3 years).

Uniquely bad

The US had the second-highest avoidable mortality rate—deaths caused by conditions that can be prevented with primary care or treated with timely medical intervention. Only Mexico had higher avoidable mortality. Similarly, the US also had the second-highest rating on years of potential life lost, a measure used to estimate premature death. Again, only Mexico had a higher rating.

The report highlighted critical weaknesses in the US healthcare system, including having the fewest primary care providers of all countries in the analysis. The US has 0.3 primary care providers per 1,000 people, while the overall average is 1.1 providers per 1,000, and the highest-ranking countries, Australia and the Netherlands, have 1.8. The US produces new physicians at one of the lowest rates and also has among the lowest hospital bed capacity levels.

The poor outcomes from America's failing health system are not evenly distributed, of course. While the US has a higher maternal death rate than any other country in the study, at nearly 19 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2023, maternal mortality for Black women in the US is 50 deaths per 100,000. The average of all the countries was 9.5, with 11 countries having maternal death rates at less than 5 per 100,000 live births. And, while the US had the third-highest suicide rate of the countries assessed, suicide rates in the rural US are significantly higher and rising. Rural Americans are less likely to have access to doctors and mental health services, the study notes.

The report notes that the US uniquely lacks universal health coverage among high-income peer countries. Mexico was the only other country in the study without universal coverage but has plans in place for universal care starting in 2027.

Overall, other countries have already come up with strategies to address the failings seen in the US health system, including reducing healthcare costs, strengthening primary care, and addressing inequities.

"What’s remarkable is not that alternatives exist, but that the United States has failed to pursue them," the study concludes.

Read full article

Comments



Read the whole story
fxer
3 days ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

Treasury Department prepares $250 bill with Trump's face on it

1 Share
US Secretary of Treasury Scott Bessent shows a proposed $250 bill featuring President Donald Trump during a press briefing in the Brady Briefing Room of the White House in Washington, DC.

Congress needs to pass legislation in order for the bill's printing

(Image credit: KENT NISHIMURA)

Read the whole story
fxer
3 days ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

La Pine Rejects Proposed Data Center Amid Public Outcry

1 Comment

Applause and cheers thundered through the La Pine City Council meeting Wednesday evening as the body quashed a proposed industrial land sale to develop a data center that generated fierce public opposition in recent weeks.  

The City Council’s unanimous vote came after hearing a combined nearly five hours of public testimony this month, mostly lambasting the proposal. People formed online Facebook groups and circulated petitions encouraging the Council to shoot it down.  

“You have to understand, we do listen to you,” La Pine City Council President Cathi VanDamme told the crowd during Wednesday’s meeting. “We do listen to you because we live here as well. Thank you for showing up and giving your opinion.” 

The vote also came after a report from City Manager Geoff Wullschlager that raised questions about the developer’s estimates for how many new jobs and how much City revenue the proposed data center would generate.  

Public opposition in La Pine is part of a trend as communities nationwide sour on data centers in their areas, fearing they will drain local water and energy resources will affecting quality of life with traffic, pollution and noise.  

Data centers are large warehouses full of computers that store and process digital information. A boom in Artificial Intelligence tools has propelled demand for new data centers to host servers to store information.  

The La Pine City Council voted in March to move ahead with the sale process of a 20-acre parcel at the 330-acre La Pine Industrial Park east of U.S. Highway 97. That vote directed Wullschlager to find out more about the data center proposal and report back to the City Council.  

The La Pine City Council was exploring selling 20-acres of Deschutes County-owned land in the La Pine Industrial Park, located about a mile east of U.S. Highway 97. Credit: City of La Pine

The initial proposal was for a 20,000-square-foot facility — about one-third the size of a football field — although developers were eyeing a potential expansion in the future.  

Sale of the vacant land in the industrial park, which is owned by Deschutes County, would have needed final approval from both the La Pine City Council and the Deschutes County Board of County Commissioners. 

“My mind on this thing was made up from the beginning because of the presentation that was made,” City Councilor Mike Shields said Wednesday. “However, it is our due diligence, it is our job, to give everything a fair chance, to learn everything we can about it. “ 

La Pine residents’ opposition came despite developer Boxminer.io promising the proposed AI data center would not use excessive water or affect electricity bills. Developers said that could be accomplished through a “closed loop” cooling system, which recirculates cooling liquid instead of evaporating water.  

In a statement on its website, Midstate Electric Cooperative, which provides power to the La Pine area, ensured customers electricity rates would not go up due to the data center, which would be required to pay for any required power infrastructure upgrades.  

The data center proposal would have used 20 megawatts of electricity, enough to power about 16,000 homes. According to Midstate, that’s a fraction of the provider’s power capacity and would have been “more than adequately serviced with no risk of disruption.” 

During public testimony on Wednesday, Boxminer.io CEO Jeff Keller touted “significant” financial and economic benefits for the City, arguing it’s exactly the kind of project appropriate for an industrial park.  

“I didn’t think it was going to be this problematic to try to put an industrial use — especially a high-end, high-tech industrial use — in an industrial park,” Keller said.  

The Sunriver-La Pine Economic Development Board had recommended the project to the City Council.  

Initially, Boxminer.io floated the potential for up to 200 full-time “high-tech value” jobs from the data center, according to a City Manager’s report from March. But those numbers were only if the facility were to eventually expand. Keller said on Wednesday he estimated 50 full-time jobs to start, adding, “I’m not 100% sure we will get to 50, but it will be considerable.” 

City Manager Wullschlager’s report cast doubt on that estimate, and some of the other numbers in Boxminer’s proposal. He found that 800,000-square-foot Amazon facilities produce about 200 higher-paying jobs. Using that job-to-square-foot ratio, Boxminer’s smaller data center would only produce about five jobs.  

Wullschlager also found the company may have significantly underestimated how much it would likely pay in electric utility franchise fees, which the City collects from Midstate in exchange for using the City streets to serve residents. 

“In both the revenue and employment categories (comparable by way of data), Boxminer’s estimates fail to yield dependable information,” Wullschlager wrote in his report.  

La Pine’s rejection comes just days before a one-year pause on property tax breaks for data centers. Earlier this year, the Oregon Legislature cut data centers out of a bill expanding the state’s Enterprise Zone Program, which is intended to lure private investment by offering temporary tax abatements.  

Regardless of the moratorium, Keller told the Council he would forego any tax breaks the data center was eligible for.  

As Keller put it, “This is millions of dollars on an annual basis that we have said we will not ask for, that because it’s not fair.” 

The post La Pine Rejects Proposed Data Center Amid Public Outcry appeared first on The Source - Bend, Oregon.

Read the whole story
fxer
3 days ago
reply
> 800,000-square-foot Amazon facilities produce about 200 higher-paying jobs. Using that job-to-square-foot ratio, Boxminer’s smaller data center would only produce about five jobs.

Finally catching on that data centers don't create jobs, the fact they ever got tax incentives is ridiculous. Their water usage is a rounding error compared to agriculture like alfalfa or almonds, so that argument is always disingenuous to me. I don't mind DCs, but the builders/operators can't suckle on the public teet anymore.
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

Blue Origin's New Glenn rocket just exploded during a static fire test

1 Share

On Thursday evening Blue Origin attempted to test fire its massive New Glenn rocket at its Florida launch site, but something went very wrong after engine ignition. The super heavy lift rocket exploded in spectacular and disastrous fashion.

The static fire test was being filmed by NASASpaceflight.com on its Space Coast Live feed, which captured video of the conflagration that followed destruction of the booster. The first stage of New Glenn, fueled with methane, produced a massive fireball above the launch site along the Florida coast, LC-36A. It is possibly the most dramatic and powerful rocket explosion since the Soviet Union's N1 rocket was destroyed during a launch attempt in 1969.

There was no immediate indication as to what caused the rocket to fail during the initial stages of the static fire test. The failure originated with the first stage of the rocket, which is powered by seven BE-4 engines. Sources said the problem appeared to start in the engine section of the vehicle.

"It’s too early to know the root cause but we’re already working to find it," Blue Origin founder Jeff Bezos said on X. "Very rough day, but we’ll rebuild whatever needs rebuilding and get back to flying. It’s worth it."

No one was injured during the failure, which sources said caused extensive damage to the company's large and complex launch site. During a pad failure in 2016, with the smaller Falcon 9 rocket, it took SpaceX more than a year to rebuild its seriously damaged Space Launch Complex-40 pad.

A true catastrophe

This is the worst disaster in the history of Blue Origin, founded in 2000.

The company has launched New Glenn three times, during each of which the first stage performed well. The company had already demonstrated the ability to land the New Glenn first stage, and impressively reused it in April for the first time.

During that third flight, carrying the Blue Bird 7 satellite, an upper stage issue caused the mission to fail. However the company responded rapidly to the in-flight failure and returned to the launch pad in less than two months this week. The first stage for this mission, nicknamed No, It's Necessary, was making its debut launch.

Prior to this launch attempt Blue Origin had in its inventory two first stages and about six New Glenn upper stages completed, and it was poised to break into a monthly launch cadence. By all accounts, the rocket was viewed as a major success for a company which, for so long, had seemed to plod along. New Glenn's success catapulted the company to the upper echelon of spaceflight enterprises in the world. That Blue Origin was on the precipice of accelerating further makes this setback all the more painful.

New Glenn an essential part of a Moon Base

The failure of New Glenn also has major implications for NASA and its surging efforts to return humans to the Moon before the end of this decade, and to establish a lunar base on the surface.

On Tuesday NASA announced that it had selected the New Glenn rocket to deliver the first two rovers, built by Lunar Outpost and Astrolab, to the lunar surface in 2028. Blue Origin has developed its own cargo lunar lander, Blue Moon Mark 1, designed to fly on top of New Glenn. It was due to launch this fall to the Moon for the first time, and again next year carrying the VIPER rover to the Moon for NASA.

Then there is the larger Blue Moon Mark 2 lander, which is due to fly on a larger and more powerful version of the New Glenn rocket with nine first stage engines, known as 9x4. NASA is counting on the Mark 2 lander, alongside SpaceX's Starship vehicle, to carry humans to the Moon on a regular basis—and soon.

Pad infrastructure severely damaged

It is too early to determine the impacts from this failure, but they will be considerable. Early reports from sources suggest that the launch infrastructure at LC-36A is severely damaged. A source indicated that one of the lightning towers may not be salvageable, and that the transporter-erector may also be damaged beyond repair.

The company recently began construction on a second New Glenn launch site nearby, LC-36B. However work there is in its early stages. It is possible, however, that completing this new launch tower may be faster than rebuilding LC-36A. New Glenn almost certainly will not launch again in 2026, and frankly a launch during the first half of 2027 would be heroic given the launch site concerns.

Blue Origin has been doing a lot of developmental work on the larger 9x4 rocket, which is expected to become the workhorse of the fleet over the smaller 7x2 rocket variant that exploded on Thursday evening in Florida. It is possible that the company now throws all of its efforts into completing work on this larger rocket.

Bezos, who made his fortune from Amazon, has largely funded Blue Origin since its founding a quarter of a century ago. He has put tens of billions of dollars into the company. Fortunately for Blue Origin, he has the financial wherewithal to sustain the company through this failure, and to accelerate its recovery efforts. NASA, too, will be very keen to see Blue Origin get back on its feet as expeditiously as possible.

If there's a small silver lining its that the rocket that exploded Thursday night did not carry its payload of Amazon Leo internet satellites. They were safe, in a nearby integration facility, awaiting launch.

Read full article

Comments



Read the whole story
fxer
3 days ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories