17804 stories
·
173 followers

Erik Visits an American Grave, Part 2,110

1 Comment and 2 Shares

This is the grave of Robert Barnwell Rhett.

Born in 1800 in Beaufort, South Carolina, Robert Barnwell Smith grew up in the plantation elite of South Carolina and boy howdy would he represent their scumbag interests all the way. He was related to a lot of the Revolutionary era South Carolina leaders. Their interests weren’t really that different than the rest of the nation at that time, but after 1800, with the rise of the cotton gin and the great wealth generated in South Carolina, that sure changed. Smith was headed into politics from a young age. He first won election to the South Carolina legislature in 1826 and stayed there until 1832. This was the moment when the state started becoming a hive of massive extremism in ways that even the rest of the South could not imagine at that time. Sure, the rest of the South might have opposed high tariffs, but talking about secession? That seems insane. That’s because it was insane.

Smith would push these ideas from the time he was young. He loved slavery. Absolutely loved it. He thought slavery was the destiny of the races, with whites naturally leading, and he thought that northern whites were stupid for not seeing this. He and people like him were the masters of the world and he intended to keep it that way. He was elected in 1832 as the state’s attorney general, running on a platform of extreme pro-slavery and nullification and that made him popular. He remained in the position until 1837.

Also, Smith changed his name to Rhett in 1838. William Rhett was an ancestor of his who was an early leader of South Carolina and who had gotten famous fighting pirates and I think was a big time slaver. Smith thought this name change was romantic and would give him additional cred, evidently, and so Robert Barnwell Rhett it became when the man was 38 years old. Seems weird to me. He was pretty fucking weird though.

Anyway, Rhett thought most of the South Carolina elite were not committed enough to slavery and secession. So in 1844. he was part of the Bluffton Movement, which was a group of extremists in South Carolina. The nation had not listened to the South bitching about tariffs and in 1842, passed another one that was not favorable to South Carolina’s interests. Rhett left this movement to stand up for another round of nullification and to threaten again to leave the union. Now, this was too early for secession and so Rhett’s real goal here was to reform the union, even if secession might be the only option. But still, this was pure extremism. It was too much for John C. Calhoun, who was still the real power in the state’s politics. He put a stop to it. But the groundwork was being laid for future actions. Rhett’s favorite newspaper, the Charleston Mercury, wrote of two great evils–the tariff and abolitionism, and stated they were “cohesive, cooperative, concurrent, kindred and co-essential atrocities.” OK then.

Rhett was pleased with the presidency of James Polk, who stole half of Mexico to expand slavery. But he thought the Compromise of 1850 was a sellout to the abolitionist north. Like everything else, only southern extremism was the answer. He convened the Nashville Convention in 1850 to unite the South in secession. The South was not quite ready for this, but he saw the progress. Meanwhile, Calhoun died. Who did South Carolina select to replace him? Yep, Rhett. Calhoun was too conciliatory anyway. But then Rhett thought the rest of the South Carolina leadership a bunch of cowards. In 1852, the legislature decided it would not push for secession right away. In response, Rhett resigned from the Senate rather than represent such a bunch of cucks.

So Rhett went home to his Charleston Mercury and spewed propaganda and pushed extremist ideas and candidates fo the next eight years. By the time the nation elected Abraham Lincoln in 1860, he was ready to rock and roll and his influence had just grown and grown. He was elected to the Confederate legislature in 1861 and remained there for the war. Like far right extremists in our government today, they all hated each other back then too and Rhett loathed Jefferson Davis.

A lot of this is that Davis, like much of the rest of the Confederate leadership, did not believe in slavery as much as Rhett. Just committing treason in defense of slavery was not enough for this man. Oh no, anyone believed in that. No, see, what was necessary was reopening the transatlantic slave trade. That became Rhett’s top priority. He ranted and raved about this at the Confederate founding convention and was infuriated that the Confederate Constitution did not solve this affront to the white race. He also believed that Confederate states should also be able to secede from the Confederacy. Give him credit, I guess. He actually believed this shit, unlike a lot of the Confederate leaders, who only talked about secession as a tool but in fact were totally authoritarian in fact. Rhett believed it.

But I want to be clear–no one and I mean no one did more to father secession than Robert Barnwell Rhett, very much including Calhoun or Davis.

Another reason Rhett hated Davis is that the Confederate president tried to create a functional nation (and let’s not really give Davis credit here, he was terrible as Confederate president even if you take out the reasons why this fake nation existed). So when Davis issued an order that the government confiscate saltpeter supplies, Rhett lost his shit. TYRANNY, he cried. HOW DARE BIG GOVERNMENT LIBERALS LIKE JEFFERSON DAVIS TRAMMEL UPON ON OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

The other thing that happened to Rhett during the war is that he lost all his money, which was of course largely invested in humans. I think a lot of his plantation land was near the Atlantic coast and very quickly, the Union army took this land over and freed the slaves, de facto if not de jure.

After the war, Rhett left South Carolina for Louisiana. At least Rhett had the late life he deserved. He had serious skin cancer problems, which led to noted disfigurement that seems to have disgusted most of the people who saw him. I can’t imagine a more appropriate fate. It eventually killed him, in 1876. He was 75 years old.

In conclusion, Robert Barnwell Rhett is the worst politician ever from the worst state in American history. Burn in hell.

Robert Barnwell Rhett is buried in Magnolia Cemetery, Charleston, South Carolina.

Also, can you help me out here–how did that Confederate flag up on Rhett’s grave end up broken and under my muddy shoes? It’s a real mystery.

If you would like this series to visit other secessionist scum, you can donate to cover the required expenses here. If I haven’t earned support for this series today, I don’t know what I can do. William Yancey is in Montgomery, Alabama and Louis Wigfall is in Galveston, Texas. Previous posts in this series are archived here and here.

The post Erik Visits an American Grave, Part 2,110 appeared first on Lawyers, Guns & Money.

Read the whole story
fxer
6 minutes ago
reply
This is a good one
Bend, Oregon
hannahdraper
9 hours ago
reply
Washington, DC
Share this story
Delete

There is no ethical consumption of HBO’s Harry Potter series

1 Comment and 4 Shares
A small boy in a red clock that has the number seven and the name “Potter” emblazoned on it in yellow. The boy has his back turned to the camera as he walks towards a group of people in winter clothing.

In the coming years, HBO wants its new Harry Potter series to become "the streaming event of the decade" as it adapts each of the franchise's seven original books. The show could very well become a hit that captures the imaginations of a new generation of fans who weren't there for the first wave of Pottermania that intensified with the releases of each book and Warner Bros.' subsequent film adaptations. And if this Harry Potter is a success, it could give author J.K. Rowling a reason to consider writing more stories set in the magical world that turned her into a billionaire.

But all of that hinges on whether people will actually watch HBO …

Read the full story at The Verge.

Read the whole story
fxer
20 hours ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
digitalmediatlm
1 day ago
reply
Designer Stiletto Sandals For Weddings And Parties
For shopping, please visit www.theluxemaison.com

宮ノ下駅 // Miyanoshita Station

2 Comments and 3 Shares

宮ノ下駅 // Miyanoshita Station

Read the whole story
fxer
21 hours ago
reply
In Hakone, Japan. Just went thru this station a couple weeks ago, a few days after the author...
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete
1 public comment
digitalmediatlm
1 day ago
reply
Digital Marketing Services For Premium Lifestyle Brands. For more details, please visit www.tlmconsultancy.com

B.C. teacher suspended after dry ice explosion in classroom: regulator

2 Comments
A person removes pellets of dry ice from a box. Carbon dioxide fumes are visible.

A teacher in southeastern B.C. has had his teaching certificate suspended for two days after he allowed students to handle dry ice with few restrictions — leading to an explosion that left a hole in a ceiling tile.

Read the whole story
fxer
2 days ago
reply
Used to love making dry ice bombs, the gallon sized handles of apple juice were great because they had thick plastic and would let pressure build longer. Put a few chunks of dry ice in, pour in some water, cap it and shake the shit out of it then throw it down the ravine. You could hear the boom across the entire neighborhood
Bend, Oregon
dreadhead
6 days ago
reply
You know students loved this class.
Vancouver Island, Canada
Share this story
Delete

Man charged with bestiality, accused of sexually assaulting horse on Vernon farm

2 Comments
Erica Van Meenen said that in January, she discovered surveillance footage that allegedly showed a man sexually assaulting one of her horses.

Read the whole story
fxer
2 days ago
reply
That horse peeking into the frame tho...
Bend, Oregon
dreadhead
4 days ago
reply
Mr Hands Jr
Vancouver Island, Canada
Share this story
Delete

AV1’s open, royalty-free promise in question as Dolby sues Snapchat over codec

1 Share

AOMedia Video 1 (AV1) was invented by a group of technology companies to be an open, royalty-free alternative to other video codecs, like HEVC/H.265. But a lawsuit that Dolby Laboratories Inc. filed this week against Snap Inc. calls all that into question with claims of patent infringement.

Numerous lawsuits are currently open in the US regarding the use of HEVC. Relevant patent holders, such as Nokia and InterDigital, have sued numerous hardware vendors and streaming service providers in pursuit of licensing fees for the use of patented technologies deemed essential to HEVC.

It’s a touch rarer to see a lawsuit filed over the implementation of AV1. The Alliance for Open Media (AOMedia), whose members include Amazon, Apple, Google, Microsoft, Mozilla, and Netflix, says it developed AV1 “under a royalty-free patent policy (Alliance for Open Media Patent License 1.0)” and that the standard is “supported by high-quality reference implementations under a simple, permissive license (BSD 3-Clause Clear License).”

Yet, Dolby’s lawsuit filed in the US District Court for the District of Delaware [PDF] alleges that AV1 leverages technologies that Dolby has patented and has not agreed to license for free and without receiving royalties. The filing reads:

[AOMedia] does not own all patents practiced by implementations of the AV1 codec. Rather, the AV1 specification was developed after many foundational video coding patents had already been filed, and AV1 incorporates technologies that are also present in HEVC. Those technologies are subject to existing third-party patent rights and associated licensing obligations.

Dolby is seeking a jury trial, a declaration that Dolby isn’t obligated to license the patents in questions under FRAND (fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory) licensing obligations, and for the court to enjoin Snap from further “infringement.”

Dolby claims infringed patents are “critical” to Snapchat’s business

Dolby is accusing Snap of infringing upon four of its patents: U.S. Patent No. 10,855,99 “Inter-plane prediction”; U.S. Patent No. 9,924,193 “Picture coding supporting block merging and skip mode”; U.S. Patent No. 9,596,469 “Sample array coding for low-delay”; and U.S. Patent No. 10,404,272 “Entropy encoding and decoding scheme.”

The San Francisco-headquartered company claims that Snapchat relies heavily on HEVC for video and has acquired HEVC patent licenses through a patent pool, but that its mobile app also “accepts AV1-compliant videos, and Snap will decode and encode these videos into other formats for delivery and viewing across a range of devices.”

“Snap’s software further tracks whether AV1 decoding is supported on a given device to stream AV1 video when appropriate,” Dolby’s suit says.

Dolby asserts that AV1 “reuses” concepts from HEVC, for which implementation is generally understood to come with licensing and royalty fees, and that the codecs "are 'based on the same hybrid block-based video-coding flow' and employ nearly the same approach to dividing images into coding units... and blocks," citing a paper published by the IEEE in 2019 and titled "Fast Hevc-to-Av1 Transcoding Based On Coding Unit Depth Inheritance.

Dolby said that it and Access Advance, which it says runs a patent pool administering AV1 and HEVC-related patents held by Dolby, have been contacting Snap to get it to license AV1 patents through an Access pool. It also claimed that Snap has been informed of the option to “seek bilateral licenses from individual” licensors.

“Despite these efforts, Snap remains unlicensed. Snap has continued to use Dolby’s patented technology without paying any royalties,” the lawsuit says.

Dolby is arguing that its patented technologies are “critical to Snap’s business, driving the efficiency and quality of the videos that help keep users engaged on the application” and that Snapchat gains “an unfair competitive advantage” by not licensing the technologies.

AV1 in question

Despite AOMedia’s goal of creating a video codec that could be adopted without concerns about fees and lawsuits, numerous tech companies outside of the group dispute if AV1 meets those claims. Two patent pool administrators, Access and The Sisvel Group, are administering AV1-related patent licenses, despite AOMedia’s objections.

“The legal framework around video codecs is well established, and incorporating patented technology carries clear licensing obligations," Access CEO Peter Moller said in a statement accompanying an announcement of Dolby’s lawsuit. "Labeling a codec ‘royalty-free’ does not eliminate underlying patent rights."

Besides Dolby, InterDigital is also suing over AV1 [PDF] and is accusing some Amazon Fire streaming devices of infringing on its patents by supporting the codec.

Additionally, European Union (EU) antitrust regulators investigated AOMedia’s licensing policy in 2022 but closed the investigation in 2023 “for priority reasons,” an EU spokesperson told Reuters at the time, noting that “the closure is not a finding of compliance or non-compliance of the conduct in question with EU competition rules.”

The results of Dolby’s and InterDigital’s lawsuits could have lasting implications for AV1 adoption, which lags behind that of HEVC eight years after its release.

“Only because Big Tech says a codec should be royalty-free doesn't mean that it is. … Given that all codecs use somewhat similar techniques, the risk of an infringement of patents belonging to parties who did not offer royalty-free licenses is substantial,” intellectual property activist and commentator Florian Mueller told Ars Technica.

Mueller said that many streaming services have operated without video codec licenses for years as patent holders prioritized collecting royalties on hardware and software products. That has changed in recent years amid the growth of streaming.

“Companies like Amazon and Disney would like to persuade courts that after many years of no one, or at least no major player, knocking at their doors, they don't have to pay now,” Mueller, who runs the online publication IP Fray, said.

Although the debate over whether a codec can be truly royalty-free goes back years, the debate around AV1 is getting more attention than previous discussions. Dolby’s lawsuit in particular could have resounding implications on the AV1 standard should a judge decide that Dolby is not obligated to license patented technologies said to be leveraged by AV1.

As Mueller pointed out, HEVC was created with most essential patent holders signing a FRAND licensing pledge, which differs from AV1’s creation:

With AV1, it could turn out that there are far more patent holders out there with essential patents but no FRAND licensing obligation. In that case, they could theoretically ask for anything, even extortionate amounts, up to the point where someone would then stop implementing AV1. And the really bad thing here, which I'm sure is not Dolby's objective but it could be someone else's, is that someone could purposely make prohibitive royalty demands for AV1 in order to discourage use of the standard.

Dolby and Snap didn’t respond to requests for comment. An AOMedia spokesperson acknowledged receipt of our questions but didn’t provide responses ahead of publication.

Read full article

Comments



Read the whole story
fxer
4 days ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories