17908 stories
·
174 followers

California’s billionaire tax

1 Share

Gabriel Zucman and Emmanuel Saez have a fascinating piece (gift link) on California’s proposed billionaire tax, which will be on the ballot in November. This is a one-time 5% tax on household wealth over one billion dollars. The value of non-rental residences doesn’t count, either, so this is unlikely to render Page, Brin, Zuckerberg, Ellison et al homeless.

Just a couple of numbers from the piece, which has great graphs to go along with it:

Inflation-adjusted, the wealth of the very richest residents of California (not the same people) increased by 73-fold between 1982 and 2026.

Mark Zuckerberg had an income of $2.8 million per day between 2019 and 2025. Assuming he spent 100% of this money, his personal fortune would have grown by $185 billion over those seven years. He “enjoyed” $143 billion in stock gains and $42 billion in retained profits over these years, to go along with $7.1 billion in reported income. This means that almost all of his money went completely untaxed, which is the situation with all these people.

A particularly fiendish little loophole in the tax code is that Zuckerberg can simply borrow, at rock-bottom interest rates, whatever money he actually spends against his capital, and as long as that capital grows faster than the interest he owes on the loans before he repays them, he will never pay any tax at all on that income.

The notion that unlimited personal wealth is compatible with anything resembling democracy is the kind of proposition you have to be mind-bogglingly stupid to consider plausible. The richest people in America are fifty times richer, literally, in real dollars than the richest people in America were when I was in college in the early 1980s. Another big difference is that I didn’t know the names of almost any of the latter people (I recognized Nelson and Bunker Hunt because of the fiasco when they tried to corner the silver market, plus I knew Lamar Hunt owned the Kansas City Chiefs), while I’m all too familiar with all of the schmucks profiled in this article, except for one of them (Huang).

Saez and Zucman do a good job responding to phony arguments about how this is all futile because these people will just flee the interview/jurisdiction. In short no they won’t because people don’t actually react that way to this sort of measure, and in any event it’s too late now because this is a one-tine tax on wealth as of 1/1/2026 so even if Larry Page wants to go to Katmandu because no one loves him here anyway that won’t effect the operation of the tax.

BTW this tax would raise $100 billion dollars to fund gaps created in California’s Medicaid system because of the rapacity of the plutocrats who bought Trump’s 2025 tax bill. And again this just a one-time tax, that will barely slow the growth of these men’s fortunes, let alone actually affect their economic circumstances in any measurable way. They’re against it because they’re pathologically addicted to wealth accumulation, and their addiction needs far more radical treatment than this, but this is the beginning of a good start.

. . . funny/not funny illustration of the problem here: A commenter tried to make a mathematical correction, pointing out that when I claimed Zuckerberg’s income was $2.8 million a day between 2019 and 2025 I was mis-stating the facts, since that was the daily increase in his wealth, which wasn’t taxable. No! His INCOME was $7.1 billion over seven years, which is $2.8 million per day. His WEALTH increased by $192 billion, which is $75 million per day.

The post California’s billionaire tax appeared first on Lawyers, Guns & Money.

Read the whole story
fxer
4 hours ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

Motorola's 2026 Razrs are almost worth buying just for their stunning looks… almost

1 Share

For the last several years, Motorola's smartphone headliners were the Razr flip phones, but 2026 is different. This time around, Moto's first tablet-style foldable, the Razr Fold, somewhat overshadows the flip phones, but a bulky $2,000 folding phone that isn't made by Samsung occupies the smallest niche in the smartphone market. A Razr flip phone is much more practical, both financially and logistically. But are these phones actually worth buying over a flat phone?

Smartphones are no longer something you need to convince people to buy. Unless you're going out of your way to exclude technology from your daily life, a smartphone is just a necessary convenience. The way some companies market their phones—making relatively boring phones look like a lifestyle choice—doesn't really take this into account. However, Motorola knows what a Razr is.

Razr Ultra open in hand All the Razrs are big phones when you open them up (Razr Ultra seen here). Credit: Ryan Whitwam

These phones are first and foremost about vibes. They're fun and colorful; there are desk clock displays, mini apps for the outer display, and a quirky camcorder camera mode. Foldables are universally gadgety and visually interesting, but the Razrs take this to the extreme with unique textures and Pantone-certified colorways. That gives the Razrs a selling point before you even get to the specs or hardware. And they need that because the speeds and feeds are nothing special.

Razr+ and Razr closed
The Razr+ is only available in the Mountain View colorway. Credit: Ryan Whitwam
Razr face down
The base model Razr has a slightly smaller screen and a strip of color above it. Credit: Ryan Whitwam
Razr+ in tent mode
The Razrs have some neat desk clock and photo frame modes. Credit: Ryan Whitwam

The 2026 Razrs don't change much in the design department versus last year's versions, but that's fine. They still look great. There are wood panels, soft touch plastics, vegan leather, and synthetic fabrics—all things you won't find on the latest devices from Samsung, Google, or Apple. These are, hands down, the prettiest phones you can buy right now.

Razr Ultra in hand back. The Razr Ultra's Orient Blue fabric back feels really nice, but it can pick up dust. Credit: Ryan Whitwam

However, even years into the foldable era, these phones are still not an easy choice for smartphone buyers, and some people shouldn't even consider getting one despite the stylish design. When buying a new phone, many folks immediately put it in an OtterBox or similarly armored case and slap on a screen protector. Then, a year or two later, when they need to take the case off for some reason, they are surprised by the color of their phone. If that's you, the 2026 Motorola Razrs are not the phones you are looking for—just move along.

Flip phone flops

All of Motorola's Razr flip phones have big external screens, offering enough real estate to run apps and reply to messages, and Moto lets you do a lot more with this screen compared to Samsung's Z Flip line.

On one hand, having an external screen can be a bit gimmicky. The phones come with a collection of games optimized for the external display, and opening the phone to use the big foldable OLED will often be faster for most tasks, but using the external screen can help steer you away from distracting apps. It provides just enough functionality to check a notification or reply to a message without tempting you to start doom scrolling.

Game on Razr screen Bundled mini games? Sure, why not? Credit: Ryan Whitwam

The foldable form factor also pays off if taking selfies is your thing. While there is a selfie camera under the foldable OLED, you can and should use the primary cameras with the external display instead. Motorola's cameras aren't up to the standards of Google or Apple, but the larger main camera sensors on these phones do a better job than any camera peeking through a hole in your screen.

But a phone that folds in half also comes with some inevitable downsides. While Motorola says its hinge is reinforced with titanium and has been tested to many thousands of folds, this is still a possible point of failure. The kind of day-to-day abuse that wouldn't affect a flat phone could cause serious problems for one with a hinge in the middle. These devices are also only IP48-rated, which means fine particles could work their way inside and affect the hinge's functionality, although the Razrs are just as water-resistant as traditional designs.

Razr Ultra in hand The Razr Ultra is a flagship phone with a flagship price (and then some). Credit: Ryan Whitwam

Even if the hinge is mechanically sound, the constant folding could be a problem for the phone's flexible OLED. With several generations of Razrs behind us, there are enough user reports to say that OLED damage from wear and tear is possible. Most of these screens will last for as long as the phone itself does, but some won't.

Specs at a glance: 2026 Motorola Razr series
Razr 2026 ($800) Razr+ 2026 ($1,100) Razr Ultra 2026 ($1,500) Razr Fold ($1,900)
SoC MediaTek Dimensity 7450X Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Snapdragon 8 Elite "Pro" Snapdragon 8 Gen 5
Memory 8GB 12GB 16GB 16GB
Storage 128GB 256GB 512GB 512GB
Display External: 3.6-inch 1056×1066 OLED, 90 Hz, 1700 nits; Internal: 6.9-inch 1080×2640 OLED, 120 Hz, 3000 nits External: 4-inch 1272×1080 OLED, 165 Hz, 2400 nits; Internal: 6.9-inch 1080×2640 OLED, 165 Hz, 3000 nits External: 4-inch 1272×1080 OLED, 165 Hz, 3000 nits; Internal: 7-inch 1224×2992 OLED, 165 Hz, 5000 nits External: 6.6-inch 2520×1080 pOLED, 165 Hz, 6000 nits; Internal: 8.1-inch 2484×2232 LTPO OLED, 120 Hz, 6,200 nits
Cameras 50 MP wide, f/1.7; 50 MP ultrawide, f/2.0;
32 MP selfie, f/2.4
50 MP wide, f/1.8; 50 MP ultrawide, f/2.0;
32 MP selfie, f/2.4
50 MP wide, f/1.8; 50 MP ultrawide, f/2.0;
50 MP selfie, f/2.0
50 MP wide, F/1.6; 50 MP ultrawide with Macro, f/2.2;
50 MP 3x telephoto; 32 MP outer selfie, f/2.4; 20 MP inner selfie, f/2.4
Software Android 16 Android 16 Android 16 Android 16
Battery 4,800 mAh, up to 30 W wired charging, wireless charging 4,500 mAh, up to 45 W wired charging, wireless charging 5,000 mAh, up to 68 W wired, wireless charging 6,000 mAh, up to 80 W wired charging, 50 W wireless charging (unsupported)
Connectivity Sub-6 GHz  5G, Wi-Fi 7 Sub-6 GHz  5G, Wi-Fi 7 Sub-6 GHz  5G, Wi-Fi 7 Sub-6 GHz  5G, Wi-Fi 7
Measurements Open: 171.30×73.99×7.25 mm
Closed: 88.08×73.99×15.85 mm, 188g
Open: 171.42×73.99×7.09 mm
Closed: 88.09×73.99×15.32 mm, 189g
Open: 171.48×73.99×7.19 mm
Closed: 88.12×73.99×15.69 mm, 199g
Open: 160 height×144.4 width×4.55 depth (mm); Closed: 160 height×73.6 width×9.89 depth (mm), 243g
Colors Hematite, Violet Ice, Sporting Green, Bright White Mountain View Orient Blue, Cocoa Blackened Blue, Lily White

This is something that you won't see in reviews—we've long moved past the point where foldable durability issues would be apparent during the few weeks reviewers use these devices before publishing the results. I try to use the hinge on foldables as much as possible when reviewing them, but I've never seen a hinge or screen fail. We know from user reports that they sometimes fail, though.

When a Razr is your daily driver for months or years, there's a higher risk of breakage than with a phone that doesn't fold in half. So if you're going to buy a foldable, it's smart to factor in the added cost of insurance. That can make an already expensive phone even more of a financial burden.

The bottom line

As gorgeous as these phones are, that alone cannot justify spending a ton of money on them. If your main concern is pure functionality, the 2026 Razrs aren't as reliable or capable as the best non-foldables from Samsung, Google, or Apple. Foldable flips don't even have the multitasking advantages of a tablet-style foldable. You have to care about the vibes to justify a Razr, and the prices don't make that easy.

The Razr+ and Razr Ultra got more expensive this year, clocking in at $1,100 and $1,500, respectively. Motorola has offered some earbuds and tracking tags as freebies to try to offset the sticker shock, but that's not enough. The Razr Ultra has flagship specs and solid cameras, but I can't think of any smartphone buyer who should seriously consider paying $1,500 for it.

All Razr phones The 2026 Razr lineup looks nice, but only the base model clocks in at a reasonable price. Credit: Ryan Whitwam

The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in the Razr+ won't be much slower in daily use, and it still has a reasonable 12GB of RAM. So that's probably a better choice for picky foldable fans. But still, $1,100 for that phone is a tough sell.

If you find yourself enamored with the idea of a stylish flip phone, neither of those phones is probably the right call. However, the base model still embodies the spirit of the Razr even if it cuts a few corners.

The 2026 Razr looks just as good as the more expensive versions—maybe even a little better. The slightly smaller screen leaves more room for the cool materials and colors to wrap around to the front. It also comes in four colors, versus two for the Razr Ultra and just one for the Razr+.

Razr and keyboard glamor shot The cheapest Razr is probably the one to get. Credit: Ryan Whitwam

The Moto Razr comes with a weaker MediaTek processor and just 8GB of RAM, but that doesn't make it any less pretty. The lower specs may benefit a certain type of smartphone buyer. Motorola has a ton of AI features crammed into its current Android software, like every other smartphone OEM, but it's a bit more restrained on the base model Razr due to the lower RAM. It doesn't even have the physical AI button from the more expensive models. I consider that a total win.

And the best part: This phone is $800. For a phone that mainly exists to look good and carries a higher risk of failure versus a non-foldable one, that's about the right price.

The Good

  • They look great
  • Hinge feels solid
  • Outer displays are big and just useful enough

The Bad

  • The Razr+ and Razr Ultra are way too expensive
  • Hinge and flexible OLED are possible points of failure
  • Silly AI button on Razr+ and Razr Ultra
  • Last year's chips in Razr+ and Ultra, mid-range specs in the base model

Read full article

Comments



Read the whole story
fxer
4 hours ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

Ninja Warrior is now officially an Olympic sport

3 Shares

There’s been a strange little revolution brewing over the last few years in the world of modern pentathlon—the weirdest, most expensive, and least-watched event of the entire Summer Olympic Games catalogue. The sport (based around a very early 20th century understanding of the skills of a modern soldier, including sword fighting, swimming, running, and firing what were later turned into laser-based guns) ran into some PR problems back at the 2020 Games, when participants complained that the fifth event, equestrian show-jumping, introduced an unwelcome random element to the sport. (Your event’s reputation is not doing great, modern-popularity wise, when it generates headlines about a pissed-off coach reportedly punching a horse.) All of which somehow trickled down to today, when Variety reports that Japanese TV series Ninja Warrior is now an official part of the Summer Olympic Games.

It’s like this: Shortly after the 2020 Games, the UIPM—the governing body that oversees modern pentathlon—decided enough was enough with the horses, which nobody seemed to like watching, massively raised the cost for new athletes to enter the sport, and were distressingly prone to getting punched. So they did some tests, and then took an official vote, deciding that show-jumping would be replaced with an obstacle course run so clearly modeled on long-running Japanese reality competition show Sasuke/Ninja Warrior that the UIPM went ahead and brought in the show’s producers to consult on building their courses. Over protests from a pretty decent chunk of current modern pentathletes—who had, it’s worth noting, invested a lot of both time and money in getting good at jumping over stuff on horses, only for all that work to be rendered moot in favor of high-impact monkeybars—the rule changes went forward in the sport’s junior competitions a couple of years ago, with a plan to officially roll it out for adults at the 2028 Summer Games in Los Angeles.

All of which brings us back to today, when the UIPM announced that not only would the 2028 Olympics version of modern pentathlon feature the obstacle runs, but that it would officially be licensed from Japanese Ninja Warrior producer TBS (not to be confused with the American TV network of the same name), which is allowing its intellectual property to be used for the events’ obstacle designs. “What an incredible honor it is for our Federation to be working closely with TBS, the broadcaster that gave Ninja Warrior to the world,” UIPM president Rob Stull said of the deal. “Ahead of LA28, this agreement represents a wonderful and unique coming together of primetime entertainment and Olympic sports culture.”



Read the whole story
fxer
15 hours ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

Is Peter Thiel the target of Pope Leo's Gandalf quote? An investigation.

1 Share

I'm not suggesting that a man like Pope Leo—the Vicar of Christ, the Bishop of Rome, the Servant of the Servants of God—would stoop to anything quite so base as "trolling" the onetime PayPal co-founder and current Antichrist alarmist Peter Thiel. But I'm also not not suggesting it, if you see what I mean.

How else to explain the novel appearance of Gandalf—yes, the pipe-smoking wizard!—in the pages of one of Catholicism's most important documents, a major papal encyclical about AI and technology? Perhaps Leo, who was born and raised in Chicago before spending decades in Peru, is simply a big J.R.R. Tolkien buff who can't get enough of magic rings, Eldar lore, and tricksy little hobbitses. Or perhaps Leo is sending a message.

In his new encyclical, released yesterday, Leo quotes one literary character in the entire 40,000-word document. It's Gandalf, doling out some of his wisdom in a scene from Return of the King: “It is not our part to master all the tides of the world, but to do what is in us for the succour of those years wherein we are set, uprooting the evil in the fields that we know, so that those who live after may have clean earth to till.”

Leo connects this speech with the "civilization of love" that he calls for in the document, stressing (as Tolkien did) the importance of "small and steadfast acts of fidelity that serve as a bulwark against dehumanization."

The Gandalf quote, innocuous on its own, feels more pointed when you realize how Tolkien is valorized (Valar-ized?) in conservative tech circles today. Peter Thiel is one of the most powerful people in such circles—and he is a Tolkien fanboy in the worst way.

Fellowship of the bling

As far back as 2012, people were running articles on how "Peter Thiel, the first outside investor in Facebook, is a huge fan of J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings series of fantasy books."

Business Insider noted that "Thiel's inner circle seems well aware of his fondness for Tolkien's world of elves and magic. One source who claims to be close to Thiel says there's an in-joke about his venture-capital firm, the Founders Fund, being nicknamed 'The Precious.'"

Thiel has named many of his companies after Tolkien's world. He co-founded the AI-focused Palantir. He launched Mithril Capital Management. He co-founded the fintech venture capital firm Valar Ventures. He has other companies named Rivendell One and Lembas LLC.

Thiel protégés include current US Vice President J.D. Vance, who has called Tolkien his favorite author and who once founded a venture capital firm called Narya (one of the Elvish rings of power).

Palmer Luckey, who launched his own Tolkien-themed tech/defense startup called Anduril, is also "launching a new digital bank with backing from Peter Thiel," Fortune reported last year. The bank's name? Erebor, naturally, another name for the Lonely Mountain, where Smaug slept atop piles of gold in The Hobbit.

Thiel and his circle like a good fantasy story. So what? According to The New York Times, even the current leader of Italy, Giorgia Meloni, used to cosplay Tolkien characters and attend "Hobbit Camps," where she "sang along with the extremist folk band Compagnia dell’Anello, or Fellowship of the Ring."

But Thiel isn't just one more investor with a Tolkien fetish. He has also been proclaiming a fairly idiosyncratic version of Christianity for years. His message has recently taken the form of a multi-night, four-lecture series about the looming dangers of "the Antichrist," a figure drawn from the Book of Revelation who opposes everything Jesus stood for.

And he doesn't seem to be a big fan of the Pope.

The Antichrist loves peace and safety

Thiel's Antichrist tour has taken him around the world, including Rome, where earlier this year the Associated Press said that Thiel's "invitation-only conference" became "so controversial that the Catholic universities initially associated with it have all denied official involvement."

While the lectures have been private, recordings of them have leaked. The Guardian has a nice write-up on them, saying that Thiel's "beliefs are diffuse, meandering, and often confusing, but one tenet he’s steadfastly maintained over the years is that the unification of the world under one global state is essentially identical to the Antichrist."

Thiel worries especially about a "woke American pope" making common cause with a "woke American president," which could lead to the world domination he fears.

You can see how Thiel's ideas—I use the word with hesitation—might come to the attention of the current, US-born Pope. But Popes don't generally stoop to Tolkien-quote battles with those who dislike them, so why now?

Perhaps it's because Thiel, despite his professed Christianity, represents a sort of tech messianism. It is technology that could save the world from the "stagnation" that grips it, he said repeatedly on a New York Times podcast interview in 2025. And the technology that could best help break this cultural stagnation is AI. Therefore, we should take the guardrails off AI, despite the risks.

I still think we should be trying AI, and that the alternative is just total stagnation. So yeah, there’s all sorts of interesting things can happen with—maybe drones in a military context are combined with AI. And OK, this is scary or dangerous or dystopian, or it’s going to change things. But if you don’t have AI, wow, there’s just nothing going on.

I'm old enough to remember life before AI. It certainly seemed like some things were going on. But to Thiel, people and governments who stand in the way of AI—especially if they in some sense represent the dreaded one-world governance of his nightmares—are themselves possible Antichrists.

If you think I'm making this theory sound crazier than it is, here's Thiel saying that his worries about "peace and safetyism"—i.e., regulation—are directly linked to the Antichrist:

But is this so preposterous, what I’ve just told you, as a broad account of the stagnation that the entire world has submitted to for 50 years of peace and safetyism? This is a 1 Thessalonians 5:3—the slogan of the Antichrist is peace and safety.

[Ed. note: The New Testament's first letter to the Thessalonians says, "You know very well that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night. While people are saying, 'Peace and safety,' destruction will come on them suddenly, as labor pains on a pregnant woman, and they will not escape." The quote emphasizes that the "day of the Lord" will be a total surprise, not that it was caused by people trying to stop wars or require airbags in cars.]

And we’ve submitted to—the FDA regulates not just drugs in the US, but de facto in the whole world because the rest of the world defers to the FDA. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission effectively regulates nuclear power plants all over the world.

In this view, Pope Leo's strident call to "disarm" AI is therefore aligned with the forces of stagnation that are used by the Antichrist to stage his or her world takeover.

Leo seems in his encyclical to be sketching a completely different vision, showing Thiel and his Silicon Valley friends that there's another way to "build." Not in a world-bestriding, revolutionary way that seeks to earn a billion dollars while strapping AI vision systems onto cruise missiles, but in a quieter way, with love and charity worked out in our local field of action.

Or, as Gandalf put it above, "to do what is in us for the succour of those years wherein we are set, uprooting the evil in the fields that we know, so that those who live after may have clean earth to till."

Leo thus calls for tech to shed its messianic and neo-colonial tendencies in order to serve humanity; Thiel instead sees tech as a savior to the poor and oppressed, a force that can head off Armageddon and Antichrist.

Thiel's vision of tech saving the world through unloosed, Saruman-style AI industrialists would be far more compelling if so many of these tech giants were not such strangely immature and insecure people.

But don't take my word for it. Here's Thiel himself, telling The New York Times' Ross Douthat about a meeting he once helped broker between top AI leader Demis Hassabis and Elon Musk:

The rough conversation was Demis telling Elon: I’m working on the most important project in the world. I’m building a superhuman A.I.

And Elon responds to Demis: Well, I’m working on the most important project in the world. I am turning us into interplanetary species.

And then Demis said: Well, you know my A.I. will be able to follow you to Mars.

And then Elon sort of went quiet...

Thiel himself sums up this meeting of the minds: "It was the dumbest meeting with Elon that we sort of brokered."

Proclamation in the shade

I'm not the only one to raise this question about the Pope's encyclical, of course.

The Catholic Herald asked, "Is Magnifica Humanitas aimed at Peter Thiel’s techno-political empire?"

Or, as tech blogger Simon Willison wrote, "I can’t help but wonder if the J.R.R. Tolkien quote from The Return of the King was the Pope throwing a little shade at Peter Thiel."

But I don't think this Pope operates according to categories like "throwing shade." As we saw when Leo tangled with Donald Trump over his war of choice in Iran, Leo sees his job as preaching and proclaiming.

"The mission of the Church is to proclaim the Gospel, to preach peace," Leo said at the time. "I simply hope to be listened to because of the value of the word of God."

His Gandalf quote may well be targeted at Thiel, or perhaps more broadly at those who think in similar ways. But it is not confrontational or insulting. It is a way of speaking across differences using a line drawn from a shared cultural resource between the two camps. It offers up a new interpretation of Tolkien's tremendous work to those who see in it a license for warfare, technological disruption, battles, and global action. Those things exist in the story, and they are exciting, but they are also terrifying and ultimately endured only for the purpose of defending community, hearth, and home.

In Tolkien's world, it is the "little people"—indeed, it is the wretched outcast Gollum—who finally save the world from the battles and technologies of the "great," and thus it is in the limited world of the hobbits that the action begins and ends.

It is in this sense, I think, that the Pope offers a different vision to the tech aristocrats of today. He explicitly asks them to give up their dreams of transhumanism and "artificial" intelligences—and to replace those dreams with something more truly human.

Read full article

Comments



Read the whole story
fxer
18 hours ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

This Dual-Sided Philips Monitor Lets You Share One Screen With Clients Without Sacrificing Desk Space

1 Share

The business monitor market rarely sees truly original ideas, but Philips may have found one with the new Philips 24B2D5300. Instead of chasing higher resolutions or curved ultrawide panels, the company has introduced what it calls the world’s first standalone dual-sided monitor, placing two full HD displays back-to-back inside a single chassis. The idea sounds unconventional at first, but its practical applications quickly become obvious in customer-facing environments, collaborative offices, reception counters, healthcare desks, banks, retail spaces, and coworking setups where information needs to be shared across a desk without awkwardly rotating a screen.

The monitor uses two 23.8-inch IPS LCD panels, each with a 1920 x 1080 resolution and a 120Hz refresh rate. Both displays support wide 178-degree viewing angles, ensuring the image remains visible and color accurate from nearly any position. Philips also includes its SoftBlue low-blue-light technology and TÜV Rheinland certification to reduce eye strain during long work sessions. Unlike standard dual-monitor setups that consume more desk space and require additional cabling, the 24B2D5300 integrates everything into one footprint while still offering two independently usable screens.

Designer: Philips

The real innovation lies in how the screens can operate. Philips’ DualView and SmartView software features allow the monitor to either mirror content across both displays or extend the desktop independently. In practice, this means an employee can keep confidential information visible only on their side while showing approved content such as invoices, forms, instructions, transaction details, or queue information to customers on the opposite display. It can also function as a collaborative workstation where two users interact with the same computer from opposite sides of a desk. Philips even claims the monitor can handle up to three simultaneous application windows through its split-screen functionality.

Connectivity is equally business-focused as each side includes its own HDMI and USB-C ports, with the USB-C connections supporting up to 65W power delivery for laptops and notebooks. The monitor can connect to one or multiple devices simultaneously, allowing the screens to function independently if needed. Built-in stereo speakers, USB hub functionality, and synchronized on-screen display controls further simplify workspace management. A 180-degree swivel stand also helps users quickly rotate the display to check the opposite screen without repositioning the entire setup.

While the hardware specifications themselves are relatively modest by gaming or creative-professional standards, the product is clearly aimed at improving workflow efficiency rather than visual performance. The monitor’s compact design could be particularly useful in environments where counter space is limited, but customer interaction is constant. Tech observers have already pointed out that the concept feels surprisingly practical despite its unusual appearance, especially for front-desk staff, service counters, and collaborative workplaces.

The Philips 24B2D5300 is expected to launch in parts of Europe beginning in June 2026, with reported pricing starting around £359.99 (roughly $480). Availability in other markets has not yet been confirmed, though the monitor’s distinctive functionality could easily attract broader global interest if businesses see value in its space-saving and customer-friendly design.

The post This Dual-Sided Philips Monitor Lets You Share One Screen With Clients Without Sacrificing Desk Space first appeared on Yanko Design.

Read the whole story
fxer
1 day ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete

APOD: 2026 May 26 – NGC 3660 and Burcins Galaxy

1 Share
APOD: 2026 May 26 – NGC 3660 and Burcins Galaxy The upper galaxy might be more photogenic, but the lower galaxy is more unusual. The galaxy up top is NGC 3660, a spiral galaxy similar to our own Milky Way galaxy in that it has several bright blue spiral arms and a central bar of stars, dust, and gas. Captured by chance in the featured deep and colorful image, surprisingly, is SN 2026cff, a supernova found just to the right of the central bar. Farther in the distance is the bottom galaxy, known informally as Burçin’s galaxy, but formally cataloged as LEDA 1000714. The center of this galaxy appears to be an old elliptical galaxy, but it is strangely surrounded by not one but two rings of stars. What created Burçin's galaxy is a mystery and remains a continuing topic of research, but it likely involves the accretion of one or more smaller galaxies.
Read the whole story
fxer
1 day ago
reply
Bend, Oregon
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories